Jim's Back!
-
Vibradiant — 12 years ago(July 01, 2013 10:45 PM)
beep you, dip$hit. Since you know the OP was posted back in '04 for a Nike commercial, you know it had nothing to do with recent events. Only soulless bits of putrefied fecal matter seek to make jokes at the expense of others' suffering and loss, esp when the body hasn't even yet grown cold.
"I like to watch"
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There' -
Vibradiant — 12 years ago(July 02, 2013 07:54 AM)
Eh, what else could be your point by posting a such a tasteless comment on a thread started by a fan 9 years ago when there are plenty of "RIP" to which to which threads to contribute? Do you really think you're providing new information, and does the same idiocy prevent you from seeing the crass taunt implied?
"I like to watch"
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There' -
Chanpuru — 12 years ago(July 02, 2013 08:56 AM)
Oh get over yourself you pretentious idiot. I've already said it wasn't a jibe it was just a comment. I've deleted it. but as for you, you can just crawl back into your hole and stop being so unnecessarily touchy.
-
Vibradiant — 12 years ago(July 02, 2013 05:47 PM)
Don't you have a dead person to mock? Cirque du Soleil just lost an acrobat, or there's all those firefighters who tragically died in Arizona. Of course theirs weren't slow and painful ends, but I'm sure you can come up with something.
Added: I see you've been busy trashing Gandolfini under the auspices of respect. Kind of a pattern for you.
"I like to watch"
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There' -
Chanpuru — 12 years ago(July 03, 2013 02:42 AM)
You really need to read things more carefully. I know that details are something you're not particularly interested in, but they're kind of important you know. Oh well, umm would you like me to say something else or would you prefer to just make stuff up and pretend I said it?
Appparently saying Jim won't be making a comeback RIP is the same as urinating on someone's gravestone. What a funny world you live in.
Ohand get back in your hole, bed-wetter. -
Vibradiant — 12 years ago(July 03, 2013 12:46 PM)
You asked if Gandolfini was taking his cocaine with a side order of lead, as well as this little gem:
Bringing this back to Gandolfini, he may have just been a glutton. No excuses, no underlying cause he was just greedy and didn't care.
Given these details, what exactly am I making up about the fact that you like to talk sh!t about dead people? Should I "walk on eggshells" with regards to your lack of respect?
And again, coming to a thread which once celebrated Jim's reentry into some level of media involvement nearly a decade ago within hours of his death with the glib commentary "eh, no he's not" pretty well shows what a mean-spirited, denial-based fool you apparently are.
Good luck with that and your grade-school insults.
"I like to watch"
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There' -
Chanpuru — 12 years ago(July 03, 2013 05:01 PM)
Good work Vibradiant. I bow to your insightfulness, you really got me with that well formulated argument.oh no wait a minute, you're just a tedious little bore who has completely missed the point. Not just missed the point but also run off to another thread desperate for ammunition and instead taken comments completely out of context and missed their point entirely!
Comprehension doesn't appear to be your strong point unless you're being deliberately obtuse to be irritating i.e a troll. I said RIP in a thread about a Jim Kelly comeback and criticised the American media (not Gandolfini you'll note) for it's coverage of his death. The Jim comment was a glib off-the-cuff remark (until you started yapping at my heels) but the Gandolfini thread became a considered debate with a point to make, all of which is there to be read and either agreed or disagreed with by anyone interested in the details.
Ah, but I used a naughty word didn't I.'details'. People like you don't like to get bogged down in things like details, context and understanding. It's better to just set a course, stick your fingers in your ears and do your best to ignore anything to the contrary that doesn't suit your narrative.
For what it's worth, I'm a fan of Jim Kelly and Gandolfini but guess what.Jim's often dreamed of comeback has tragically been dashed along with our hopes and Gandolfini died in non mysterious circumstances due to his excessive consumption. Not too controversial a position to take I would have thought. Those two comments shouldn't be too hard to grasp.
If you're still confused don't bother responding because this is just pointless and quite honestly a bit boring. -
Vibradiant — 12 years ago(July 03, 2013 05:40 PM)
Your disparaging remarks about Gandolfini in that "considered debate" are plenty comprehensible, all within the false pretense of respect. Very nice. Recognizing the possibility I'd misjudged you, I looked at your profile and at random, immediately found a post calling a recently deceased, magnanimous individual a greedy glutton, a seemingly pertinent fact considering the issue at hand.
And yes, your original post in this thread was exactly "a glib off-the-cuff remark". That was my point all along. Within a day of his passing, you tried to be a comedian about a sobering loss. It screamed for equal disrespect, and you can't handle the result.
"I like to watch"
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There'