Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. https://www.filmboards.com/board/p/556809

https://www.filmboards.com/board/p/556809

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
14 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    Daverat — 16 years ago(June 02, 2009 10:23 AM)

    " by - ThoughtProcess on Wed Apr 8 2009 00:07:29
    Which was an offshoot of John Carpenter's "The Thing.""
    "by - VelvetStrokes on Fri May 29 2009 19:15:42
    Which was a rip-off of Hawk's "The Thing from Another World.""

    A legitimate remake is not a rip off.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      dukovni2000 — 16 years ago(September 22, 2009 08:47 PM)

      thaz right. they chose a remake cause they ran out ideas for a film.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        alesisqs61 — 16 years ago(September 22, 2009 08:56 PM)

        But actually.. John Carpenter's The Thing more resembled the original novella than The Thing from Another World so it's really not even a remake.it's a different translation of the same novella.a better one at that.
        I heard there's to be a prequel to John Carpenter's version though.it will suck I'm sure.
        http://www.vimeo.com/1986276
        http://www.youtube.com/user/alphazoom

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            horrorshowmovie — 16 years ago(September 23, 2009 06:23 PM)

            to be fair, even if this idea has been done a million times, it could still be a good movie
            Do I think it will be a good movie? definitely not, but it's possible

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              jeffscsr — 16 years ago(September 25, 2009 08:13 PM)

              nice one nagumo and the others who corrected that idiot.
              the thing is not a remake


              Eric C 4 Prez

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                alesisqs61 — 16 years ago(September 27, 2009 03:44 AM)

                I'm watching it now and so far it's entertaining and suspensful enough. Sure it's not John Carpenter's The Thingbut what is?
                It's a different take thoughnothing takes over your bodyyou simply get this bug and die from it, it's just very deadly and contagious.
                http://www.vimeo.com/1986276
                http://www.youtube.com/user/alphazoom

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  M24 — 16 years ago(October 02, 2009 02:28 AM)

                  I agree with alesisqs61 it's not bad and just like a different take on the thing. I'm assuming it was low budget so I think they did a prety good job. Creepy and i liked the sets, very "thing" like. Not the kind of movie i'd pay to see at the cinema but a cheap rental 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    daveleary7 — 16 years ago(September 27, 2009 01:51 PM)

                    oh who gives a toss if an idea has been done before or not. I think you will be pretty hard pushed to find something totally new that no1 else hasnt done in someway or another.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      TheBeardedWonder — 16 years ago(September 28, 2009 07:51 PM)

                      Exactly. As long as it's done well again, who cares? Everything is a semi ripoff of something else, which itself was a semi ripoff.
                      Unfortunately, this was just a bad movie. They didn't improve upon anything nor present anything new. Just weak in about every way
                      "Andrew, we can't possibly be dead. We have cable." - Nothing

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups