Do you put this movie in Hitchcock's top 5?
-
djsnafu23 — 16 years ago(May 30, 2009 09:30 PM)
Wow, exactly what Saltedut says! Weird, thjats my top 5 too. Rope 1st though.
myspace.com/bankrupteuropeans
Coz lifes too short to listen to Madlib -
kikiteka — 16 years ago(August 16, 2009 09:58 PM)
Absolutely! It's way ahead of it's time. There is so much between the lines, and it's absolutely crammed with symbolism. You can't possibly see it all in one viewing. I've seen it several times and every time I see it, I notice something else. Just the other day I noticed that when Uncle Charlie greets his sister for the first time, her young son and daughter are standing in front of them, a reflection of how they see each other. Big sister, baby brother.
-
jgiannantoni05 — 16 years ago(September 05, 2009 11:02 PM)
I can see why Shadow is Hitchcock's personal favorite. It is in my top 5. But I'll admit a slight partiality to the "charming killer" Hitchcock films. My list evidences this partiality.
My top 5 Hitchcock (no particular order):
Notorious
Psycho
Shadow of a Doubt
The 39 Steps
Rope
Vertigo may make this list, needs a rewatch. The Lady Vanishes is not far from this top 5. -
minerva-23 — 16 years ago(October 20, 2009 12:09 PM)
I haven't seen all of his movies, but of the ones I have seen, this is my 5:
1 Rear Window
2 Shadow of a Doubt
3 Strangers on a Train
4 Vertigo
5 Notorious
I LOVE so many other movies though! It's hard to choose only 5.
Also: Why no love for Strangers on a Train? I think it's fantastic -
vanityfair_713 — 16 years ago(December 15, 2009 09:31 PM)
Yes definitely. In terms of both story and execution. Aside from being a totally exciting movie to watch.
Dial M for Murder
Shadow of a Doubt
The Lady Vanishes
Rear Window
Notorious
Personally, I think I have too much bloom. Maybe that's the trouble with me. -
franzkabuki — 15 years ago(April 28, 2010 06:36 PM)
I think it belongs firmly among the 5 worst films Hitchcock ever made.
In short, what he did was create a character as fascinating, unique and compelling as Uncle Charlie, have this character played by a great actor and then throw him into a complete f-cking cartoon. Throughout the entire film he is surrounded by an army of one-dimensional, preposterously chipper caricatures of zero nuance or interest. Everyone is so ridiculously upbeat that the mere news of Uncle Charlies arrival is greeted with shockwaves of collective euphoria by the entire family. And then they babble - boy do they babble. The entire film is filled with endless yacking, dished out in bouts of stiff overacting; only very occasionally is some suspense or more appropriately sinister atmosphere allowed to creep in.
And then we have this silly device of having that horrible little man Hume Cronyn rain in from time to time to cheerfully hobnob about how to kill people - presumably to highten tension (a clumsy move he also repeated in Strangers On The Train). What it does however is cheapen the thing by taking it down onto a dimestore pulp novel level. And so it goes just about everything is constantly undercut by inappropriate overacting. Very rarely is there an actual air of danger - when Cottens presence is allowed to occupy the center stage. Dont happen too often though - Im afraid the only way to save this movie would have been for Uncle Charlie to strangle the entire family (minus the Charlie chick, of course) as well as Cronyn right upon arrival.
In addition to all that the film has to offer 2 of the most risible "assassination attempts" in all of Hitch - first, a wooden staircase is broken (apparently the broad should have died of a twisted ankle or a broken leg) and then setting up a gas chamber expecting the victim simply to walk into it. And, of course, theres the ending which looks every bit as silly as its reputation suggests. 4/10.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan -
g-nicol27 — 15 years ago(June 02, 2010 05:13 PM)
I completely agree. The family was a (bad) joke, his sister was just irritating, and even more irritating
was the way Charley Junior couldn't walk anywhere without flouncing - whether happily when
she met him at the station, or frantically on her way to the library, and in fact most times when she walked. I found this body over-acting distracting. Daft plot. NOT one of his best. Ginger -
kikiteka — 15 years ago(August 11, 2010 03:08 PM)
But that was the point! They're all upbeat and good natured with a healthy outlook on life, and he'snot. The contrast between Uncle Charlie and his family is
supposed
to be pronounced. He grew up in the same environment as his sister, and she's fine, which implies that it's not their upbringing that causes him to be this way. It's just him, which makes him scarier because he's completely unpredictable. Not only that, the sort of dizzy behavior of the family ensures that everyone is just completely oblivious to this guy who has serious problems, and the only person who notices is Little Charlie. Hence the tension! -
franzkabuki — 15 years ago(September 29, 2010 05:01 PM)
Upbeat is one thing, but here everyone but Cotten is reduced to a majorly annoying walking caricature. The balance is completely off and instead of highlighting or stressing the tension, all darkness simply dissolves in the allaround goofiness. What a film like Blue Velvet gets about right, ASOD misses by a mile.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan