Which zombie flick from Italy/Spain is better?
-
paultagonist — 17 years ago(September 19, 2008 04:39 AM)
I couldn't really stand
Nightmare City
.. my biggest peeve was all the zombies had weapons. Roaming around the Italian countryside, they just happened to find hatches and knives and stuff. Yeesh. Lame.
Hell of the Living Dead
wasn't much better, but at least the gore was a little. They're both pretty crappy zombie flicks though. But I had to force myself to sit through
Nightmare City
. Some whiskey might've helped that.
The real trick to life is not to be in the know, but to be in the mystery. -Fred Alan Wolf -
aerostonefloyd-1 — 15 years ago(May 06, 2010 09:31 PM)
Nightmare City all the way. It's like my worst nightmares come to life, pseudo zombie people RUNNING around and SHOOTING/STABBING any and everybody. Oh yeah and I actually happen to enjoy the "twist" ending.
-
Boutros_Boutros_Sirhan_Sirhan — 11 years ago(August 29, 2014 09:59 PM)
Oh God, Hell was more hilarious (unintentionally of course), though both were very funny. Nightmare has more of a real plot and was more of a straight horror film and a decent hero. Both films had amazingly stupid leading ladies, and tons of gore (Hell was gorier). The zombies in Hell were so non-threatening at times that the characters had to almost literally throw themselves at them and stand still to make them threatening, at least in nightmare Cit the zombies could run and were smart to a degree.
Both films should be on How Did This Get Made or one of the two MST3K offshoots. -
DeadandBuried81 — 10 years ago(August 14, 2015 12:32 PM)
I prefer Nightmare City, I have the 2 pack of this and without saying both are B movie schlock, Hell of the Living Dead is really frustrating to watch, were NC becomes fun and entertaining.
www.thecultofhorror.blogspot.com
