why isnt this in the top 250
-
Dantu00e8s — 15 years ago(February 02, 2011 08:31 AM)
So it's a failing of humanity that this movie isn't in the Top 250? Holy Hyperbole!
As to your big fat question, that's tricky. I didn't love the Dark Knight, but think this movie wasn't as good regardless. Avatar is a turd, so my answer just depends on whether Avatar or Come and See is a bigger turd. And that's probably not worth measuring.
Anyway, I completely disagree that this is "cinema's most authentic, gut-wrenching and outstandingly performed portrayal of senseless evil and the folly of man."
It may be authentic. It's debateable, but also a debate I won't enter into. Regardless, authenticity doesn't equal quality or importance. I think the acting, editing and direction was awful and it wasn't even as subtle as the Star Wars prequels. -
HikerBoy57 — 15 years ago(January 06, 2011 08:15 AM)
It used to be, not too long ago, and its rating wasn't much lower than now but other films' sheer number of votes may have pushed it out.
This is a shame, because I never would FOUND this film if I hadn't been scanning the IMDb top 250 for great films I hadn't yet seen. This deserves to be back on the list.
The war is not meant to be won it is meant to be
continuous
. -
SouthStreet — 15 years ago(February 12, 2011 08:09 AM)
Near the end of the film, I noticed my right thumb was hurting and the rest of my hand was asleep. My hand was gripped in a clench on the armrest, the thumb contorted and locked in the cupholder. It had obviously been like that for awhile. That is how I knew I had dissolved into the protagonist. I don't care much or rankings or ratings which are subjective.I do know "Come and See" was a powerful war film with incredible sound,cinematography and editing. I would not call it anti-war. It is about the Russian soul, life and resolve at the hands of brutal occupiers who viewed them as vermin; a young boy's adventure becomes a descent into a world of depravity.
-
McArty — 14 years ago(November 05, 2011 04:03 AM)
-
anthony-suomi — 14 years ago(March 04, 2012 02:27 AM)
I think that the top 250 list is great! okay, there are many films that shoulndt mind be, but everyone can calculate the list them selfs. they have given the formula how they do it, to calculate the weighted average.
persoanlly, I havent seen this film yet, but it seems good! -
TheSilverScreenJunkie — 13 years ago(June 05, 2012 10:19 PM)
Yeah, not sure what you guys did but its on the list now and i stumbled upon while viewing the 250, and now im definately trying to find this movie to watch
http://thesilverscreenjunkie.blogspot.com/ - Lets discuss movies without IMDB haters! -
mjlangenbru — 12 years ago(February 07, 2014 07:33 AM)
UPDATE
The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) - BACK IN
The Battle of Algiers (1966) - BACK IN
Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) - BACK IN
Les Diaboliques (1955) - BACK IN
Ikiru (1952) - BACK IN
Fanny and Alexander (1982) - BACK IN
The Wages of Fear (1953) - Needs 800+
Throne of Blood (1957) - Needs 4,000+
La Grande Illusion (1937) - Needs 4,500+
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (1927) - Needs 4,500+
The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928) - Needs 5,500+
Come and See (1985) - Needs 6,000+
Tokyo Story (1953) - Needs 7,000+
Sherlock Jr. (1924) - Needs 8,500+
Seppuku (1962) - Needs 12,000+