@magneticmonopole
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Politics
Vlad. — 3 years ago(April 24, 2022 08:52 AM)
@magneticmonopole
Yet another example of why men cannot masquerade as women.
The trans movement need to check itself. It is becoming anti-women, although in this case, idk that the ladies in question mind it. But this “trans” Casanova is a man.
Stop. -
WarrenPeace — 3 years ago(April 24, 2022 09:35 AM)
When the F is anyone going to say enough is enough and stop being so damn PC wishy washy and declare that they are and always will be men?
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall -
nemesis — 3 years ago(April 24, 2022 11:50 AM)
No they do not. You said "Fully trans women literally have periods with cramps and all that wonderful jazz."
Only a person with a uterus and ovaries have a menstrual cycle with bleeding and cramps, in other words a biological woman. Trans women may experience something similar to PMS due to hormones. -
MagneticMonopole — 3 years ago(April 24, 2022 11:54 AM)
I have seen trans woman complain about having painful cramps so I inferred from this that some of them received the full package of donated internal female organs. Sorry if that inference was wrong, but it seemed justifiable at the time.
-
nemesis — 3 years ago(April 24, 2022 12:12 PM)
As far as I know transplants of that nature are extremely rare and are performed on biological women who are born without a uterus with the aim of her giving birth. The donated organs are temporary and are removed after birth.
Although there is a debate on the rights of trans women to receive such a transplant, it certainly is not the norm for trans woman to have transplanted uterus if indeed it has ever happened.
It's a long way from "Fully trans women literally have periods with cramps and all that wonderful jazz." -
MagneticMonopole — 3 years ago(April 24, 2022 03:00 PM)
It's called making a correction. You know, sort of like when a newspaper goes back and edits something after a fact checker informs them of a mistake.
I acknowledged having made a factual error and fixed the posts where I could in order to better reflect what I
should have written
instead. How is that bad?