More of Hollyweird's fantasy of Iconic made up Wyatt Earp and those who know nothing of history subscribing to a televis
-
Karl Aksel — 4 years ago(December 18, 2021 02:26 PM)
You asked who is the author as if you cant read it yourself, do you want me to write a biography for you too?
I didn't ask the
name
of the author, you twit. But who is this guy, what makes him qualified?
Responsibility? I say and do whatever I want without any equivocation. It must be tough living in a word where you must hold accountable for everyone's action.
Holding people accountable for
their own actions
is called living in the real world. You posted an unsourced article by someone
you don't even know who is
, that makes you an idiot.
Self-Correcting, bots and other people correcting it, which I'm sure all equivalent to scholars and Masters.
In practice, actually yes. There is still chaff to be sorted from the wheat, but anyone with the vaguest familiarity with source criticism can use Wikipedia to great effect. That's why the history of each Wiki-article, as well as the discussion pages to each article
and
the history of the discussion pages are available to you at the click of a button.
I had already included common knowledge, yes wikipedia, and searches. I guess that is too much for you to comprehend. Comprende?
And I pointed out that "common knowledge" is irrelevant here, because the particulars of Wyatt Earp
do not constitute common knowledge
. Why is this so hard for you to grasp?
Your questions are counters. So if you have counters you gotta back why you acting like a fool!
My god, you're thick.
Claims
need to be backed up. Questions are counters, yes,
but they are not claims
. Let me demonstrate, because you're obviously a child:
"What time is it?"
"CAN YOU BACK THAT UP??????"
See how stupid that is? -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(December 18, 2021 03:45 PM)
Someone who is read and know what he's talking about.
I dont know the reporters in the news neither, I dont know the politicians, doctors, officers, and people around me. I guess I shouldnt quote, source anyone since I dont know who they are.
Do you work for Wikipedia? or do you use it to turn in school material. Whatever the cause I'm sure your work is of manument proportions.
If you actually read a book about Wyatt instead of going by artistic media interpretations you would see how comical the vast differences are. IF!
When you counter and ask stupid questions like an idiot! Than you must have some basis for feeling on the contrary otherwise your a complete idiot! So what are your basis coming from??!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
Karl Aksel — 4 years ago(December 20, 2021 12:09 PM)
Someone who is read and know what he's talking about.
Says who? To me he's just a guy on the internet.
I dont know the reporters in the news neither, I dont know the politicians, doctors, officers, and people around me. I guess I shouldnt quote, source anyone since I dont know who they are.
How do you figure that's remotely comparable? All those positions - with the notable exception of politicians - require qualifications.
Do you work for Wikipedia? or do you use it to turn in school material.
No one
works for
Wikipedia. It is entirely voluntary, and not even the admins make a dime.
Whatever the cause I'm sure your work is of manument proportions.
You think I'm as young as you? I'm old enough to spell "monumental", I can tell you that much. I'm also old enough to know what an encyclopedia is meant for, and what it is
not
meant for.
If you actually read a book about Wyatt instead of going by artistic media interpretations you would see how comical the vast differences are. IF!
So you say. You could be right for all I know, but then I
don't
know, do I? Which is precisely why you need to
demonstrate
why anyone should listen to you. So far you have only demonstrated that you do not know the value of source criticism. I even suspect you were entirely unfamiliar with the term until I brought it to your attention. This means one would have to be a fool to take your word for anything.
When you counter and ask stupid questions like an idiot!
Asking someone to source their claims is idiotic, now?
Than you must have some basis for feeling on the contrary otherwise your a complete idiot! So what are your basis coming from??!
Your grammar is falling apart here, but I
assume
you are asking "why would you question what I say unless you believe I'm wrong"? Well, I'll explain it to you:
You are the one to create a thread here lambasting this movie, calling it "a load of crap" and being all indignant about it. You offer no arguments. Naturally one is given to wonder why you say these things. Eventually you do post a link, which you tell people to read carefully. I didn't have to read it carefully, however, to tell right away that there is no reason to read it very carefully: it cites no sources. And based on your disturbing attitude towards source criticism, I am guessing that you found an article you liked, because you felt you learned something - and now you're treating it like gospel. If anything contradicts that article, then those
other
sources must be wrong - the article can never be wrong. Is that about right? I was like that myself when I was in my teens, I guess. You'll wise up in time, too. -
Joc Spader — 4 years ago(May 16, 2021 04:06 PM)
My only complaint was Kurt Russel standing almost even height to a 6'2 Sam Elliot when they greeted each other at the train station. Kurt can't be no more than 5'8ish
Tell you what…When I send my ex-wife her money…you can lick the stamps. -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(May 21, 2021 11:34 PM)
When he says the above Banner, you know it was about to be a duel and not only that it was a twist of shock because he was lying one sec. but then surprised and came to duel even ahead of Wyatt.
Also his passive- aggressive manner is also violent and aggressive. There are many example of this previously in the film.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(May 24, 2021 01:12 AM)
Ooh really,
so why did they use Historical names, stories, location, and added that little detail on the side, based on a true story MORON!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
bigbadwolf666 — 4 years ago(May 30, 2021 12:33 AM)
WHEN THE WHOLE SHIT IS FULL OF CRAP IS NOT BASED ON ANYTHING EXCEPT ONE'S IDIOT IMAGINATION MORONNNNNNNNN!!!!!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.