VFX don't hold up

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

spookyrat1 — 11 years ago(November 01, 2014 11:56 PM)

They're meant to be cartoonish.
Exactly and that's why they still work well. This ain't no sci-fi extravaganza.

[fgadmin]

ubcool — 11 years ago(June 13, 2014 06:25 AM)

they still look great to me..

[fgadmin]

sackofwhine — 11 years ago(November 07, 2014 06:12 AM)

Oh shut up, who cares. They still look better than most beep released today

[fgadmin]

DracTarashV — 11 years ago(November 14, 2014 09:52 AM)

I think they do.
Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!

[fgadmin]

conquerorsaint — 10 years ago(October 05, 2015 05:33 AM)

they've aged better than most movies and still look impressive for 1994 vfx

[fgadmin]

chilone — 10 years ago(November 30, 2015 04:22 PM)

Seems to me, you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

[fgadmin]

threepwoodsrevenge — 10 years ago(February 22, 2016 09:01 PM)

Just my two cents, but the fx in this movie DO hold up and look stunning to this day. I remember being blown away by the effects in this movie and The Shadow back in the theaters. They both have their charms still, but The Mask's fx holds up so well because it was never trying to be realistic.

[fgadmin]

gerbilstunts — 9 years ago(April 30, 2016 09:07 AM)

Just watched it again for the first time in ages and I agree the effects are still tremendous, even if it had been made today if it looked this good I can't see anyone complaining.

[fgadmin]

Michael71 — 9 years ago(May 08, 2016 03:43 AM)

I think it does hold up, as does the whole film. It's not the greatest film bit it was a part of our childhoods, and Jim Carrey is great in the role.
I enjoyed the film.