So Utterly Disappointing…

[fgadmin]

Jim Shortz — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 09:53 PM)

Also, I hated the whole race angle. It felt like it was shoehorned into the movie in an ill-advised attempt to give it some "edge."
Yeah, you know it's the 90s when that stuff starts getting shoved down your throats.

[fgadmin]

— 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 10:23 PM)

I DON'T know WHY so MANY prefer this OVER
Die HARD 2
?? Makes NO SENSE to me! My guess is that they are
NOT
TRUE ACTION flick fans. IF you are a TRUE action film buff, then one and two are SUPERIOR to three.
“Call a SPADE, a SPADE; and a TRANNY, a TRANNY, or an IT!!!”.
"THAT'S SOME BAD
SHIT
,
HARRY
!".

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(July 26, 2022 02:43 PM)

Here, you're right. Im not a fan of Die Hard action. I am of Action like 90's Chuck, Stallone, Segal, etc… but not of Bruce in these films so that makes sense why I like this one over the other ones.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(July 27, 2022 12:57 AM)

Once Samuel L. Jackson was added to the film, it was decided to make it a race angle.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 12:49 PM)

false.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 12:50 PM)

Nothing wrong at all by using NYC as a film location. smdh.

[fgadmin]

Jim Shortz — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 10:07 PM)

I think this one suffers a lot from its generic location. New York City is featured in so many thrillers and action movies to the point were it's lost a lot of its luster. The first two Die Hard films benefitted tremendously from their novel locations of being set in an office building and an airport.
Agreed 100%.
The skyscraper & airport are some of the more original settings for an action film.
That's why I dig Under Siege, got a great setting like Die Hard.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(July 20, 2022 11:06 AM)

You're another idiot. Nothing wrong at all by using NYC as a film location. smdh.

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(July 26, 2022 02:41 PM)

yea, and the third one is pretty much out in the open.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(July 27, 2022 12:56 AM)

um, no

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(July 28, 2022 12:13 AM)

um, yes
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(July 28, 2022 12:30 AM)

um, yes

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(July 30, 2022 12:24 AM)

Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(August 01, 2022 11:40 AM)

Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(August 01, 2022 11:52 AM)

yes, ya 66aggot.

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(August 01, 2022 12:05 PM)

Guess you cant spell neither, doesnt surprise me coming from a one word-loser!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(August 01, 2022 08:42 PM)

you really think i cant spell? you're the dumb one. the misspelling is intentional, ya staggit.

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(August 08, 2022 12:32 AM)

So is your dumbing!
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

𝙽𝚈𝙲 [] — 3 years ago(August 09, 2022 12:05 PM)

you're weird, weirdo

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(August 11, 2022 10:35 AM)

I think you just reached dumbest level -3.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.