So Utterly Disappointing…
-
bigbadwolf666 — 3 years ago(July 26, 2022 02:43 PM)
Here, you're right. Im not a fan of Die Hard action. I am of Action like 90's Chuck, Stallone, Segal, etc… but not of Bruce in these films so that makes sense why I like this one over the other ones.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -
Jim Shortz — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 10:07 PM)
I think this one suffers a lot from its generic location. New York City is featured in so many thrillers and action movies to the point were it's lost a lot of its luster. The first two Die Hard films benefitted tremendously from their novel locations of being set in an office building and an airport.
Agreed 100%.
The skyscraper & airport are some of the more original settings for an action film.
That's why I dig Under Siege, got a great setting like Die Hard. -
-
Jim Shortz — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 09:59 PM)
I don't mind DHWAV but the McClane character works better by himself rather than with a sidekick. Die Hard 1 & 2 compliment each other well while the third feels different, very 90s. The woman who slices up the fat cop is the worst character in the die hard series.
] — 3 years ago(July 27, 2022 12:57 AM)
you're the dumb one. the misspelling is intentional, ya staggit.