Wow this was scripted before 9/11
-
sljones44 — 15 years ago(October 15, 2010 06:37 AM)
- Frank Carlucci former Secretary of War; affiliated with PNAC; served as chairman of the Carlyle Group (1992-2003); on BoD of BDM International.
- William Kristol PNAC co-founder; adherent of Leo Strauss; editor of The Weekly Standard; strong advocate of the Iraq war.
- William Perry former Secretary of War; associated with the Rothschild's banking empire through Global Technology, a Rothschild affiliate.
- James Woolsey former CIA director; PNAC member; claims "incompetence" was reason for 9-11.
- Newt Gingrich former Speaker of the House; PNAC member; reputed to be a member of the CFR; served on the Pentagon's War Policy Board.
- Henry Kissinger long criminal history; wanted for war crimes in several countries; sat on War Policy Board under Perle; chosen to lead 9-11 Cover-Up Omission Commission.
- George H.W. Bush Skull and Bones; CIA operative former head of CIA; son (Neil) was friend of Hinkley, who shot Reagan when Bush was VP; war profiteer.
- Tony Blair British Prime Minister on 9-11; ally and partner in crime of George Bush; London 7-7 bombings were also "false flag" operation.
- Pauline Neville-Jones International Governor of BBC on 9-11; Chairman of UK Joint Intelligence Committee (1991-1994); Chairman of QinetiQ Group, a war technology company with government customers in UK and USA; Chairman of Information Assurance Advisory Council (IAAC).
- Mahmoud Ahmad head of Pakistan's ISI; had Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh wire $100,000 to lead 9-11 "terrorist" patsy Mohammad Atta.
- Benjamin Netanyahu former Israeli Prime Minister; said 9-11 was "good" for US-Israeli relationship; in NYC on 9-11 and in London on 7-7 bombings.
- Ariel Sharon Israeli Prime Minister on 9-11; heavy Mossad involvement in 9-11 (200 Israeli intelligence agents rounded up after 9-11, five Mossad agents arrested filming and celebrating WTC collapses, employees of Mossad-operated company at WTC notified hours before plane hit)deceased 4-14-2006.
Did you know that from the 103 people named on the this list of suspected 9-11 criminal co-conspirators there are:
22 current or former members of George W. Bush's White House 21.4%
4 current or former members of Congress 3.9%
6 current or former FBI agents 5.8%
6 people currently or formerly with the CIA 5.8%
6 current or former officials of New York 5.8%
12 current or former high-ranking USG military commanders 11.7%
13 current or former USG officials (not included above) 12.6%
12 current or former members of PNAC 11.7%
16 consultants, lobbists, or members of a "think tank" (not including PNAC) 15.5%
12 engineers 11.7%
34 current or former corporate executives 33.0%
4 senior "statesmen" 3.9%
5 Bush familiars and close relatives 4.9%
1 Canadian 1.0%
1 Pakistanian 1.0%
2 Arabs 1.9%
2 Brits 1.9%
4 known or suspected Mossad agents 3.9%
14 people who hold "dual citizenship" 13.6%
27 Israelis (including people with "dual citizenship" noted above) 26.2% - to which former CIA Analyst, Ray McGovern would attest to, specifically.
WAKE UP. Put the preconceptions down. Understand the above and how they benefited from this. The underwear bomber hoax didnt go down, and neither did the Swine Flu Hoax.
-
bangersuper — 15 years ago(October 20, 2010 05:58 AM)
103 involved co-conspirators? And not one of them has been caught talking about it or come forward to admit it? No realistic solid evidence has ever been shown. Other than job titles and some group affiliations, everything you wrote are unfounded accusations and speculations with no proof.
Any criminal investigator will tell you that 9/10 times the most obvious suspect is the guilty one, and the simplest answer is usually the right one. They will also tell you that the more people involved with a criminal plan the more likely an informant will come forward to turn in the rest or at least mention it to someone else who turns them in. 103 people cannot keep their mouths shut for very long.
I am not satisfied with any of the "evidence" that has ever been pointed at because it's all speculative or flimsy at best. Plus it's never from a credible source; it's usually from some nut on a movie blog website. J/K.
{Lobbyists run the country and Howard rules} -
insidious420 — 15 years ago(February 04, 2011 01:12 PM)
Remember, ignorant dummmies the world over once thought Earth was the center of the solar system, and that the world was flat, mainly because that was what the reigning (mainstream) political and religious powers were preaching at the time. Anyone with a differing opinion was ridiculed & persecuted for it. If you don't consider all opinions and take time to at least pursue possibilities outside of your own (mainstream) view, you are potentially risking being in the group of similar 21st century ignorant dummies who deny anything even remotely suspicious about the official stories of 9/11 & the 7/7 London bombings. Nothing is black and white, and nothing is rarely ever as simple as what someone tells you it is, ESPECIALLY if that information is meant to be disseminated amongst and believed by MILLIONS of people as unquestionable fact.
I'm sorry to sound insulting, but I can't help be amazingly frustrated at some people's sheer willful ignorance and ignoring easily-researchable facts simply because they are not in the mainstream media. It's depressing. Anger and vitriol are NOT helpful in any way toward convincing someone of an opinion, or of even CONSIDERING a differing viewpoint, but damn, being nice and trying to explain and kindly asking to research things certainly doesn't work either.
It's hard to change your opinion about something, especially when it has significant emotional and moral ramifications. It is literally fear-inducing to even entertain the thought that one cannot trust their government. It is a mental barrier that many people cannot cross, and therefore they block out anything that leads their thoughts down that path.
Amongst VERY MANY other things, personally I think it's odd that a group of cave-men terrorsists were smart enough to pull of the hugest, most complex, most successful terrorist attack in US history, yet they were not smart enough to plan and execute ONE SINGLE TERRORIST ATTACK SINCE THEN on US soil. Where are all the "sleeper cells" the US gvmt has been BOOGY BOOGY scaring everyone about over the years? Give me a break.
False-flag government operations are not a new thing. They've been around long before 9/11 & 7/7, long before the prior WTC attack(s), long before the Murrah building, long before the disturbingly coincidental line in this movie which started this thread, and certainly long before any single one of us in this thread has been alive.
But go on, continue to totally ignore anything and everything that should raise suspicion even in a retarded monkey's crippled brain:- Bush reading a story about a goat to children in a Florida school during the 9/11 attacks, Andy Card walking in to interrupt and tell Bush of the 2nd attack, and Bush calmly sitting there & continuing to read, with no change in expression on his face, as if this were expected, or as if he is a total moron. Research this a bit on your own (after all, that's what I did), there are probably still hundreds of articles and videos.
- Rumsfield stating "missile that hit the Pentagon" Research this a bit on your own (after all, that's what I did), there are probably still hundreds of articles and videos.
- Of the hundreds of surveillance cameras on the Pentagon grounds, and on the surrounding properties, only ONE extremely questionable short clip (literally 4 or 5 frames of video) was EVER released to the public of the Pentagon crash, due to "national security risks". National security risks??? From something that ALREADY HAPPENED? WHY EVEN RELEASE ONE VIDEO IF ALL THE OTHERS ARE "RISKS"???! Research this a bit on your own (after all, that's what I did), there are probably still hundreds of articles and videos.
- http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ Professional pilots stating the maneuvers exhibited on 9/11 (in particular the Pentagon plane) would have been impossible to pull off even by the most skilled pilots, but especially impossible by the supposed muslim terrorists in the supposed commercial air liners. I have the "luxury" of living within driving distance to the Pentagon, ride the train past it every day, and have driven down 395 past it for the specific purpose of verifying for myself, with my own eyes: how ridiculously impossible it would have been for ANYONE to fly a large commercial airliner at the angle and speed as what supposedly happened, missing 395 entirely, and slamming almost perfectly level into the Pentagon (as the video referenced in my above note shows) on 9/11.
- Steel-reinforced skyscrapers literally vaporizing into powder in near-free-fall. I watched a lot of Discovery channel and TLC when I was a kid, and was particularly fascinated with controlled demolitions and beep blowing up (what little boy isn't?), so it amazed me that flying planes into buildings has at least 100% of the efficiency of planned, controlled demolitions. Hell, if we can fly plans into buildings to vaporize them into dust, bring them down into their own footprint, all in a matter of hours,
-
t-bone_2003 — 14 years ago(April 27, 2011 01:55 AM)
This thread is pretty amusing. It's hard to believe people are STILL going on about this crazy conspiracy stuff.
This video of a debate between a skeptic and a 9/11 truther illustrates pretty clearly where conspiracy theorists go wrong in their critical thinking:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWYyfvOrO-s&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-1klxTIsXo&feature=related -
SpikeHat — 15 years ago(February 18, 2011 09:51 PM)
@ sljones44:
WAKE UP indeed. Your non-movie-related post is out of place, and not likely to convert supporters over to your planet. Your mention of Karl Rove aka "Bush's Brian" made me laugh.
Oh, you missed a perp #104. Saddam Hussein the real mastermind of 9/11 using his famous WMD's. Good thing W finally got him; "Mission Accomplished"!
BTW I enjoyed
The Long Kiss Goodnight. -
jojozlo — 14 years ago(March 27, 2012 11:01 AM)
Finally, 9/11 was a religious inspired attack by extremists that call themselves Muslim. Bangesuper
Really? How do you know this? You are the one person who knows who was behind 9/11? Why are you perpetuating this so called "stupid" debate, if it's so stupid. Makes you kind of sound stupid. Is this part of a book you are writing. I can debate what I want an not be an idiot. Your facts make no sense, you make no sense. You have nothing to offer, goodnight. -
suasheva — 13 years ago(April 21, 2012 02:21 PM)
This video maybe help > http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=160547124011002
Watch, listen, think, and find the truth. peace. -
lexicron — 13 years ago(September 10, 2012 04:28 AM)
That's weak. They did the same thing in that other movie, too.
It kind of gives the political mentality of some filmmakers. I don't know what they think is so valuable about destorying you're own buildings in favor of something that costs too much to do. Not just money, but lives. What do they think is so kind and generous about places like Afghanistan or Iraq. They were terrible places before we were at war with them. -
shawneuser — 13 years ago(March 03, 2013 12:15 PM)
OP, I just saw the movie again last night, and I rewound that scene. It is indeed CREEPY.
The plot point was inspired by the '93 WTC attack, which WAS carried out by Muslims, thus the reason to blame the next attack on them, but the close call on the casualties is what catches most people as bizarre.