Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. How could you not have John Goodman

How could you not have John Goodman

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
7 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas


    chivers677 — 15 years ago(June 20, 2010 05:56 AM)

    This movie is parfetic and just simply awful, i don't know how they could make a sequel to the original without John Goodman, it looks as if it was a direct to video movie because it looks as if they couldn't afford the original cast. This looks really bad i watched a few minutes but just stopped when i found out it wasn't the original cast. Did anybody actually like this?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Kynzie131 — 15 years ago(August 08, 2010 03:40 PM)

      John Goodman apparently felt another movie was over kill Hence why this one is a prequel to the animated series, to make it look like the characters have aged and matured a bit..
      I agree though, John Goodman was amazing as Fred! In fact the whole cast was much better in the first movie!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        thirdrow — 15 years ago(March 19, 2011 06:51 PM)

        I like this movie better than the first actually. This one was lighter and peppier, while the original Flintstones film seemed overproduced. The original cast (while all great actors) didn't seem like they were having a lot of fun with the material.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Irishdrummer007 — 13 years ago(September 25, 2012 09:20 AM)

          Because John Goodman was not all that great as Fred. He should stick to Roseanne. Mark Addy was way bettter as fred.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            arkay — 12 years ago(October 01, 2013 01:32 PM)

            Rubbish. Years before this movie was made I already had pictured him as Fred Flintstone. He just totally looked the part.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              jazzcky — 10 years ago(September 06, 2015 11:39 AM)

              What's "parfetic" is the fact that you can't spell "pathetic" correctly.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups