Before the boards shut down, before all of this is gone, you have one task.
-
-
Thin_Paper_Walls — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 08:44 PM)
Guilty. I can't vouch for every single accusation, but his own statements in court corroborate his alleged modus operandi, and several of the victims made allegations before the flood of accusations in 2014.
The journals "Science" and "Nature" also have a political agenda. - jon-gwynne -
Harry_S_Plinkett — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 09:23 PM)
It certainly does sound incriminating, that statement he made
http://bitly.com/HarryPlinkett -
Harry_S_Plinkett — 9 years ago(February 17, 2017 10:07 AM)
So far we've got overwhelmingly guilty.
Anyone else care to chime in?
http://bitly.com/HarryPlinkett -
Klein_Returns — 9 years ago(February 17, 2017 11:18 AM)
Innocent.
http://media.ifunny.com/results/2015/11/10/4cj4ciw3up.jpg -
Utpe — 9 years ago(February 17, 2017 12:03 PM)
Guilty.
If he admitted to the crime(s) under oath during that civil deposition in 2005, then yeah, I think it's safe to say that he probably did something to, at least, one woman.
As for what kind of sentence he should receive: If I were the Judge assigned to his case, instead of giving him the full 30-year imprisonment sentence, I'd slap him with 30 years of probation, make him wear an ankle bracelet, register as a Sex Offender, and have him pay the maximum fine since he's able to afford it.
I mean, the guy's gonna be, what, 80 years old pretty soon? He would just die in prison anyhow. Save the taxpayers money, and have him live out the rest of his days under house arrest.
Maybe throw in several hundreds of hours of community service so he just isn't sitting around watching
Pokémon
and eating Jell-O Pudding Pops.
