Music sales skyrocket after singer dons pro-Trump dress to Grammys
-
Klein_Returns — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 05:30 PM)
What happened to Dash on Fox News??? That proves my point.
http://media.ifunny.com/results/2015/11/10/4cj4ciw3up.jpg -
DeepConvection — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:01 PM)
You're making a lot of assumptions about people you don't even know. About people you're not even informed about.
As a matter of fact, Dash got fired for saying things Fox didn't want said on air and continued to defend Trump after that.
http://conservativetribune.com/stacey-dash-on-trump-ban-intel/"All great truths begin as blasphemies."
- George Bernard Shaw
-
infinityinterrupt — 9 years ago(February 17, 2017 09:54 AM)
"What happened to Dash on Fox News??? That proves my point."
No it doesn't. You have yet to prove any claims of people pretending anything but feel free to try again.
"the absence of evidence is the actual evidence." Tcob44 -
santannadiablo — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 09:49 AM)
Did you read the comments below the story? Hilarious, reminds me of when the left called for a ban on Chick Filet for a day and Cick Filet had record sales that day. I bet they still think the MSM is reporting news accurately.
-
EdmundOG — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 11:32 AM)
Yeah, it's real funny how Chick Fil A had a brief sales spike, then their sales fell lower than they were before, and they stopped supporting those anti-gay and anti-family charities that had everyone so mad. Lol, ha ha, stupid leftists with their actually working boycott.
Wait, what's your point? -
RaiderJedi — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 11:42 AM)
Link? Because I only found these. But they seem to be the exact opposite of what you were saying
http://www.nrn.com/us-top-100/2016-top-100-why-chick-fil-no-5-fastest-growing-chain
https://www.google.com/amp/www.eater.com/platform/amp/2016/5/11/11658438/chick-fil-a-service-sales?client=ms-android-att-us
So, what was your point?
I got new boots. Black, steel toe. Very dark, mature boots. All other boots are kiddie -
EdmundOG — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 11:45 AM)
Yeah, they're growing in 2016, the boycott was 4 years ago. I can't find anything right now on the sales dip, but I know the huge numbers obviously didn't last, and they stopped supporting the anti-gay and anti-family groups in pretty short order. If they were a good profit option, they wouldn't have done that.
-
indy_go_blue44 — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 12:23 PM)
I think you misread or misunderstood (deliberately) the impact of the "boycott" on Chick-fil-A. Seems that "boycott" only gave them more attention.
Chick-Fil-A Sales Soar In 2012 Despite Bad PR
In the latest sign that all press is good press, Leon Stafford of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that Chick-fil-As sales soared 12 percent, to $4.6 billion, in 2012. The good fortune follows several years of impressive expansion and strong sales, which have pushed the privately-held companys valuation north of $4.5 billion, making billionaires out of its founders.
Chick-fil-A caught a great deal of flak throughout the year after its president Dan Cathy came out against gay marriage and in support of the biblical definition of the family unit. Gay rights activists staged protests at locations around the country, and some even called for a boycott of the brand.
But if the uproar dampened enthusiasm for the brand among pro-gay rights consumers, it also inspired vigorous backlash from some conservative (and politically apathetic but poultry-loving) customers. Soon after the height of the controversy, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee dubbed (via a Facebook posting) August 1 Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day, leading to record sales throughout the chain.
These latest sales data are just further proof that all that negative coverage didnt hurt demand for chicken sandwiches among Chick-fil-As core consumers.
Strong sales look likely to continue for some time. The company opened 96 new outposts in 2012, after opening 92 in 2011, so more and more of the country now has access to the food. Plus, Chick-fil-A has backed down from its opposition to gay marriage Cathy has even apparently become friendly with a top LGBT rights activist. So it may only be a matter of time before pro-gay consumers become as enthusiastic as the rest of the country.
CORRECTION:: This article has been amended to reflect that Huckabee, not Chick-fil-A, instigated the Appreciation Day event.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/31/chick-fil-a-sales-2012_n_2590612.html
Feministas praising Sharia law are like Jews praising Nazism. -
EdmundOG — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 03:51 PM)
Eh. I may have been misinformed about the sales dip, but the point is, the boycott worked. Chick-fil-A no longer supports anti-gay and anti-family organizations, it's clear they saw that their business interests were better served by not doing so. If they did that while sales were steadily increasing, it only strengthens the point. No business has ever stopped supporting gays because of a conservative boycott.
-
Final_Hitokiri — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 06:22 PM)
Eh. I may have been misinformed about the sales dip, but the point is, the boycott worked. Chick-fil-A no longer supports anti-gay and anti-family organizations
Um Chick Fil A always allowed gays to dine at their restaurants. It was never an issue.
And their sales did increase. So the "boycott" had the exact opposite effect of what a boycott is supposed to do. -
EdmundOG — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:22 AM)
Um Chick Fil A always allowed gays to dine at their restaurants. It was never an issue.
Um I never said it was an issue, nor did anyone who was boycotting them. The issue, as I said in that bit you quoted up there, was their financial support of anti-gay and anti-family organizations.
And their sales did increase. So the "boycott" had the exact opposite effect of what a boycott is supposed to do.
No, it had the exact effect of what a boycott is supposed to do, which is to change policy.
There were two groups involved here.
Group A said "We are unhappy that Chick-fil-A gives money to these organizations, and we will not eat there until they stop."
Group B said "We are happy that Chick-fil-A gives money to these organizations, and therefore we will eat there more often."
Chick-fil-A responded by stopping donations to the organizations in question.
So which group got what they wanted? -
DeepConvection — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 11:55 AM)
You're right, as long as you're an oligarch or ultra-rich corporate beneficiary who would like to exploit the rights and wealth of the mid and lower classes for your own gain.
"All great truths begin as blasphemies."
- George Bernard Shaw
-
Guitar_King — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 11:26 AM)
She's number one on Amazon.com over anti Trumpers like Beyonce, and Katy Perry. This is an approval rating that's not being faked.
Donald Trump for President 2016 -
