Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. How come no sequel

How come no sequel

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
13 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    RbDeraj — 9 years ago(June 01, 2016 09:28 PM)

    This is correct.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      Milk_Tray_Guy — 9 years ago(September 30, 2016 06:25 PM)

      It's based on a comic, and the story of the comic book ends there. Plus, there is nothing else to tell. A sequel would actually ruin it.
      Yes.
      All for a box of chocolates

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        jtkreis-148-306662 — 9 years ago(May 24, 2016 12:26 PM)

        Did you miss the end?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          justinscheepers-72818 — 9 years ago(June 06, 2016 12:26 AM)

          God I hate it when people are sequel hungry. Can't we just leave a good story alone? Or do we have to make 12 movies about it until it gets as utterly ruined as Terminator?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            David_Lynch — 9 years ago(August 08, 2016 09:53 PM)

            I recall Bruce Campbell saying something like a movie has to make it's budget plus a half to be considered a success. According to IMDB V only took $70m compared to a budget of $54m

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              nicholasctracy — 9 years ago(August 11, 2016 10:00 PM)

              Just because a movie is good or successful doesn't mean there needs to be a sequel. Why isn't there a sequel to Titanic (successful) or 5th Element (good - eventually cult classic).
              Sometimes a movie says all it needs to say.
              As a massive fan of this movie, I feel I could only be disappointed in a sequel.
              The only sequel I can think of (I'm sure there are more) where I was alive when it came out in theatre AND I liked it better/as much as the original was Blade II ( beep part 3). If a Mc dies, hard to make a sequel. A prequel would be interesting though.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                forumulaa — 9 years ago(October 25, 2016 06:34 AM)

                Sometimes a movie says all it needs to say.
                As a massive fan of this movie, I feel I could only be disappointed in a sequel.
                I couldn't agree more.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  Milk_Tray_Guy — 9 years ago(December 10, 2016 07:25 PM)

                  Sometimes a movie says all it needs to say.
                  As a massive fan of this movie, I feel I could only be disappointed in a sequel.
                  Agreed.
                  The only sequel I can think of (I'm sure there are more) where I was alive when it came out in theatre AND I liked it better/as much as the original was Blade II
                  I also liked Blade II better than Blade.
                  "A big ball of wibbly wobbly, timey wimey stuff"
                  The Tenth Doctor explains all.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    duongdogg — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 06:51 PM)

                    I would watch a prequel though.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      Rooney_Mara_Lover — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 07:08 PM)

                      If you've seen it, you'd know why.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups