How come no sequel

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — V for Vendetta

---

chrismatt83 — 9 years ago(April 28, 2016 09:25 AM)

I would thikn that this was a box office hit with a solid story and grat action scenes. Allways wondered why no sequel..

[fgadmin]

Line-of-Flight — 9 years ago(May 12, 2016 01:00 PM)

Guess.

[fgadmin]

Noelitede — 9 years ago(May 13, 2016 04:55 AM)

It's based on a comic, and the story of the comic book ends there. Plus, there is nothing else to tell. A sequel would actually ruin it.

[fgadmin]

RbDeraj — 9 years ago(June 01, 2016 09:28 PM)

This is correct.

[fgadmin]

Milk_Tray_Guy — 9 years ago(September 30, 2016 06:25 PM)

It's based on a comic, and the story of the comic book ends there. Plus, there is nothing else to tell. A sequel would actually ruin it.
Yes.
All for a box of chocolates

[fgadmin]

jtkreis-148-306662 — 9 years ago(May 24, 2016 12:26 PM)

Did you miss the end?

[fgadmin]

justinscheepers-72818 — 9 years ago(June 06, 2016 12:26 AM)

God I hate it when people are sequel hungry. Can't we just leave a good story alone? Or do we have to make 12 movies about it until it gets as utterly ruined as Terminator?

[fgadmin]

David_Lynch — 9 years ago(August 08, 2016 09:53 PM)

I recall Bruce Campbell saying something like a movie has to make it's budget plus a half to be considered a success. According to IMDB V only took $70m compared to a budget of $54m

[fgadmin]

nicholasctracy — 9 years ago(August 11, 2016 10:00 PM)

Just because a movie is good or successful doesn't mean there needs to be a sequel. Why isn't there a sequel to Titanic (successful) or 5th Element (good - eventually cult classic).
Sometimes a movie says all it needs to say.
As a massive fan of this movie, I feel I could only be disappointed in a sequel.
The only sequel I can think of (I'm sure there are more) where I was alive when it came out in theatre AND I liked it better/as much as the original was Blade II ( beep part 3). If a Mc dies, hard to make a sequel. A prequel would be interesting though.

[fgadmin]

forumulaa — 9 years ago(October 25, 2016 06:34 AM)

Sometimes a movie says all it needs to say.
As a massive fan of this movie, I feel I could only be disappointed in a sequel.
I couldn't agree more.

[fgadmin]

Milk_Tray_Guy — 9 years ago(December 10, 2016 07:25 PM)

Sometimes a movie says all it needs to say.
As a massive fan of this movie, I feel I could only be disappointed in a sequel.
Agreed.
The only sequel I can think of (I'm sure there are more) where I was alive when it came out in theatre AND I liked it better/as much as the original was Blade II
I also liked Blade II better than Blade.
"A big ball of wibbly wobbly, timey wimey stuff"
The Tenth Doctor explains all.

[fgadmin]

duongdogg — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 06:51 PM)

I would watch a prequel though.

[fgadmin]

Rooney_Mara_Lover — 9 years ago(January 28, 2017 07:08 PM)

If you've seen it, you'd know why.