Is the dad supposed to be following his children throughtout the film because he seems to turn up (on his own) at the mo

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 28 Weeks Later

---

Crafty78 — 9 years ago(January 23, 2017 06:14 AM)

Is the dad supposed to be following his children throughtout the film because he seems to turn up (on his own) at the most random places? If not then I find it quite laughable that he just seems to be there. I mean what are the chances of that, really?
I also really couldn't stand the way the film was shot, everything is filmed far too close up and the shaky cam really does begin to annoy you after a while. The original is far superior to this, and was done on half the budget.

[fgadmin]

Wildman's smol peeny — 3 years ago(January 25, 2023 12:37 PM)

The way the dad was as an infected spoiled the movie for me. This was the only thing I disliked. He either turned or was immune. None of this inbetween bs.