Why can't vaginas be shown in R-rated movies?
-
la_cinematheque — 13 years ago(May 12, 2012 10:19 AM)
Hairless labia is a Western trend that's not anywhere close to universally adopted even in countries where it's most popular. Sorry kiddo, but what you see in porn and among a generation raised on porn isn't a reflection of how most of the women in the world handle pubic grooming.
-
grrrdevin — 14 years ago(March 03, 2012 01:49 PM)
In Victorian England, for example, a woman could not even expose her ankles without condemnation.
Choose facts, not feminism.
"I've been living on toxic waste for years, and I'm
fine.
Just ask my other heads!" -
Frostrose — 13 years ago(June 22, 2012 09:16 PM)
Whatever There are 100000000000 movies with female nudity and loads of them show bush and more than that as well. And how many movies have full frontal male nudity?
What rating they get - I don't care, because there is already too many movies with female nudity so if there's anything that's discriminating it is that they always use women to sell crap.
Why is it always OK to show naked women on TV, but not men? You can see bush, you can't see penises. There's the real double standard. -
Death163 — 13 years ago(February 13, 2013 04:10 PM)
All you could see is bush any time a vagina is shown in a rated r movie it has to be covered by either real public hair or a murkin (pubic topay) to prevent the lips or clit from being shown there has yet in the 100+ year history of movies to be a rater r movie that showed a women without massive amount of pubic hair mean while any rated r film can show a shaved penis and it's ok that's that's difference.
"The People Of America Have Spoken THE REAL TITLE TOWN U.S.A IS VALDOSTA GEORGIA"