Still Holds Up Great 3 Years Later
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Avengers
NeonManiac0 — 10 years ago(May 06, 2015 10:26 PM)
Age Of Ultron was a very good sequel but this is definitely better and 3 years later holds up remarkably well. Still extremely entertaining and high with the rewatchability. For me only The Winter Soldier is better.
-
swordedsoul — 10 years ago(May 27, 2015 01:05 PM)
I agree with Cyborg, the first Avengers has not faded on me yet after many many re-watching's.
Looking forward to AOU coming to Itunes so I can have a 4 hour marathon.
I dont give half a hump if your innocent or not, so where does that put you?Shephard Book -
Socialman — 10 years ago(May 28, 2015 11:23 AM)
thats just like sayin the dark knight sill holds up 6 years later better than the dark knight rises
Well, that's because TDK
IS
better than TDKR, and neither is holding up as well as the first Avengers is.
Fabricati Diem, Pvnc !
RIP Terry Pratchett -
Uberiffic — 10 years ago(November 16, 2015 01:09 PM)
TDK is a quality film. This coming from as Marvel as fanboy gets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gCBiJ3QJnk&feature=player_embedded -
mh-newressistance — 9 years ago(September 03, 2016 09:15 AM)
I think, The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises (The Dark Knight especially) both are a superior movies and comic book movies than any MCU movie so far, especially when it comes to comic book accuracy. Nolan understood how it's important to respect the mythology from the source material, but Marvel always changes important aspects from the comics for their own sake. The Dark Knight isn't just an amazing comic book movie. It's an amazing movie in general. The Avengers Good comic book movie, but not a great movie. Lacks substance, contains of average acting, has no ambiguity to the story and the characters. It's a popcorn flick (which isn't a bad thing). The Dark Knight, of course, is more than just an entertaining movie.
-
ejs8882000 — 10 years ago(October 03, 2015 08:25 PM)
Well it's kind of obvious that the other post was saying how it's weird to say something like that since it's not like the film was made 20 years ago. Three years is NOT a long time at all, and not a whole lot has changed. So really to say this movie holds up well from a VERY short time ago, is kind of silly.
-
preachcaleb — 10 years ago(June 02, 2015 11:35 AM)
What 3 years later is no time of length in the movie industry
I was just about to say the same thing. You don't say "still holds up" after only a few years.
There should be at least a decade of time passing before that can be used.
Can't stop the signal. -
ThomasMagnumPI — 10 years ago(August 04, 2015 10:12 AM)
It can be used one month out if the person saying it has seen it multiple times. The mark of a great film is holding up and being entertaining even if you know what is goingto happen. This film and its sequel does that.
-
fiero-49251 — 10 years ago(August 10, 2015 03:37 PM)
It's in a loop apparently! Never gets old even though I'm more a DC devotee!
http://scifiblogs3.blogspot.com/
-
-
- (Sci-fi Homage)
-
-
http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/
- DW & B's 7
-