This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Monster

---

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

dave1033a — 18 years ago(February 23, 2008 04:43 AM)

Behave yourself Sorry, no it is not, ever!!!
"Every day above ground is a good day!"

[fgadmin]

MetroidMan — 18 years ago(February 24, 2008 06:40 PM)

lmao better than cloverfield not even within lightyears

[fgadmin]

jbaker1-2 — 17 years ago(April 18, 2008 12:43 PM)

Compared to this piece of trash, 'Cloverfield' - a decidedly mediocre movie - looks almost as good as its fanboys claim it is.

[fgadmin]

espojay — 17 years ago(October 07, 2008 07:15 PM)

Cloverfield is as good as the fanboys claim it isbut anyway this movie was sooooo unbelievably bad it will make u cry. You will watch it and scream "WHY!!!! WHY CANT ASYLUM MAKE A BETTER MOVIE THAN THIS!!!!?!? WHY CANT THEY JUST MAKE AN ORIGINAL MONSTER MOVIE INSTEAD OF A CLOVERFIELD RIPOFF!?!?!? OH MY GOD SOMEONE KILL ME!!!!" That will be what you say after watching this.
I'm a silent watcher. I float above you all and quietly watch you rag on all the noobs

[fgadmin]

rick-deckard45 — 17 years ago(April 28, 2008 06:31 PM)

if the only movies you will ever see include this and "teaching miss tingle" then yes

[fgadmin]

rlange-3 — 17 years ago(August 11, 2008 01:44 AM)

Unlike many, I like Cloverfield a lot. This one just stinks. It's awful. It's just THAT bad.
Cloverfield had some breathtaking shots, two monsters that were scary, and acting that was passable. This had wild shaking, two space cadets saving the world from global warming running around saying "I'm an American" every 30 seconds, and constant "damaged film" special effects which seemed mostly designed to avoid having to face up to the total lack of anything interesting in the movie.
Don't waste your time.