The simple reason that there is no obvious homosexuality (although it doesn't have to have that label- in a prison where
-
SnoozeAlarm — 13 years ago(August 30, 2012 03:23 AM)
Oh, boy, here we go again.
No, I'm not claiming that heterosexual anal sex is appealing. The thought of a heterosexual couple engaging exclusively in anal sex, to the exclusion of vaginal sex, would be unappealing to me.
But the frequency of anal sex among heterosexuals is a drop in the bucket, so to speak, compared to homosexuals.
I have my doubts whether you'll agree with even that obvious point.
http://tinyurl.com/cjsy86c -
billwenham — 13 years ago(August 30, 2012 04:20 AM)
Well, I'm guessing it's actually only half of the homosexual population that has anal sex to begin with, unless there's a lot of kinky lesbians out there.
And even then, I don't think it's nearly as frequent as you may think. But at least when gay men do it, it's for a reason. You know, with the prostate being the male G-spot and all. -
SnoozeAlarm — 13 years ago(August 30, 2012 04:52 AM)
Well, I'm guessing it's actually only half of the homosexual population that has anal sex to begin with, unless there's a lot of kinky lesbians out there
I'll greet that statement with a hearty duh.
And even then, I don't think it's nearly as frequent as you may think
Knew you'd say that. The other half I was waiting for is that heterosexuals engage in it far more frequently than I'd like to believe.
Buddy, you and I have no common ground. Our viewpoints are incompatible. Let's leave each other alone. Of course, after you post your inevitable "final word" comments.
http://tinyurl.com/cjsy86c -
billwenham — 13 years ago(August 30, 2012 04:59 AM)
Well, never one to disappoint, I just find it odd that you'd think I was going to say heterosexuals engage in it far more frequently than you'd like to believeas I have no idea how frequently you think heterosexuals engage in it.
I'm not sure exactly what makes our viewpoints incompatible. I never even gave you my viewpoint. -
lee1741 — 13 years ago(October 11, 2012 09:31 AM)
Why don't movies where there's a totally ripped male lead show him going to the gym six times a week to get his body that way? We all know he's got to be spending a significant time in the gym, and working it in to his daily schedule, which would in turn affect events that happen in the movie.
The reason is because some stuff just isn't essential to the story, even if it is obvious that it has to be happening behind the scenes. -
jlgas — 10 years ago(August 09, 2015 01:46 PM)
Great point, many films concentrate on lead roles getting it together without this being particularly fundamental to the plot - eg. lead male and lead female find time in a film to have sex, at which time a trivial point or two about their personal histories come out
-
TheFatDruidofNacyl — 12 years ago(October 28, 2013 09:20 PM)
I've heard from people that claim to have been in prison that rape isn't really that common. It seems to be exaggerated in movies or TV shows about prison life.
I was more curious how they were able to get food often enough for them all to survive. I know some supplies were dropped but they seemed to only go to the evil group. I think they did hint cannibalism but wasn't really shown. For the other group trying to be more civil. I didn't see much hunting to suggest there was plenty of animals, or farms to show they had a growing agriculture. Plus where did all the stuff that kept washing up on the shore come from?
I wouldn't have complained if they had some scenes with rape but it wasn't needed.
Come visit my
blackrosecastle.com
stephentheblackroseenterprises.com -
DianaLis — 11 years ago(January 05, 2015 01:10 PM)
As you pointed - it's mid 90s movie. Homosexuality was not a trend as it is now-a-days.
http://diandianusfilmovus.blogspot.com/