The simple reason that there is no obvious homosexuality (although it doesn't have to have that label- in a prison where

[fgadmin]

texagander — 9 years ago(June 08, 2016 07:50 PM)

I want to comment on this topic, but no one in there right mind would ever read all the way to page 8.

[fgadmin]

DianaLis — 11 years ago(January 05, 2015 01:10 PM)

As you pointed - it's mid 90s movie. Homosexuality was not a trend as it is now-a-days.
http://diandianusfilmovus.blogspot.com/

[fgadmin]

Rena_Mahone — 11 years ago(April 05, 2015 03:26 PM)

Yeah, I was totally disappointed by the lack of softcore gay sex.
There weren't even homoerotic subtexts.
Boycott movies that involve real animal violence (& their directors)

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

Rena_Mahone — 9 years ago(June 04, 2016 10:06 AM)

LMAO! My post was sarcastic, btw.
Boycott movies that involve real animal violence (& their directors)

[fgadmin]

sagat4 — 10 years ago(September 22, 2015 06:33 AM)

It was good it was left out. I don't want to see any of that nonsense

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

aeolipile1-794-378681 — 10 years ago(February 23, 2016 09:02 AM)

quick! someone spell nonsense correctly before anyone else replies !!

[fgadmin]

aeolipile1-794-378681 — 10 years ago(February 23, 2016 09:10 AM)

AND, I've rarely seen a film with MORE homosexual innuendo than this one.

[fgadmin]

Krukger — 2 years ago(June 22, 2023 06:16 AM)

you can't spell because you're mentally retarded

[fgadmin]

Chicxulub — 2 months ago(January 19, 2026 11:47 PM)

I guess Ray Liotta could've had a fruity sidekick for comic relief like the black guy in
Mannequin
"All these buff men…There's no escape, but who wants to?"