Philosophically stunted ideas

[fgadmin]

dbentley666 — 11 months ago(May 01, 2025 11:47 PM)

He was clearly responding to idiots who argue that homosexuality is unnatural. It isn't. It doesn't follow that he's arguing that
all
behaviour in nature is suitable for humans.

[fgadmin]

/.ㅤ — 11 months ago(May 01, 2025 11:49 PM)

Yes he is.
My password is password.

[fgadmin]

dbentley666 — 11 months ago(May 01, 2025 11:50 PM)

Where does he say it's okay to **** on people from trees?

[fgadmin]

/.ㅤ — 11 months ago(May 01, 2025 11:51 PM)

He implied it by appealing to nature.
My password is password.

[fgadmin]

dbentley666 — 11 months ago(May 01, 2025 11:55 PM)

Nope. It was a selective move, blocking the claim that homosexuality is unnatural.
Slashie says being gay is unnatural.
Patrick says animals display gay behaviour (therefore it is natural).
Slashie says that Patrick claims all animal behaviour is human behaviour.
Not a syllogism at all.

[fgadmin]

/.ㅤ — 11 months ago(May 01, 2025 11:57 PM)

Slashie never said that. Only bible thumpers say that anyway. So this is all just a big strawman.
My password is password.

[fgadmin]

dbentley666 — 11 months ago(May 01, 2025 11:58 PM)

He was citing a specific slashie who argued that both homosexuals and transgender persons suffered from a disease. If you want to distance yourself from that, well and good.

[fgadmin]

/.ㅤ — 11 months ago(May 02, 2025 12:00 AM)

That never happened. Patrick just made that up.
My password is password.

[fgadmin]

dbentley666 — 11 months ago(May 02, 2025 12:00 AM)

I read that thread. It happened.

[fgadmin]

LivingDeadBoy️ — 11 months ago(May 02, 2025 12:01 AM)

No. It happened in the thread where Rob, myself, innocentuser, and slashie, were engaged in a debate about the nature of truth.
Fidelio♟️