Pre-emptive pardons?
-
Yermom_Is_God — 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 03:23 PM)
No, technically not until sentencing. But clearly in this argument for you "winning" is far more important than facts and truth, so continuing further will be nothing but a waste of time. Therefore, you "win." Congrats!
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God — 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 04:02 PM)
/.ㅤ said...
..unless the treaty specifically equates conviction with a finding of guilt.
Being dishonest as always.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God — 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 04:03 PM)
Yes, your re-writing of the law without any authority is correct. You "win."
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Pottymouth — 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 04:06 PM)
Yermom_Is_God said...
Yes, your re-writing of the law without any authority is correct. You "win."
Quoting something out of context does not mean you won, even as you misinterpret the law.
Found guilty of a felony and convicted. -
Yermom_Is_God — 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 04:08 PM)
Pottymouth said...
Quoting something out of context does not mean you won, even as you misinterpret the law.
Found guilty of a felony and convicted.
Right, I've already given credibility to your unauthorized changing of laws. You "win."
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
MovieManCin2 — 1 year ago(December 13, 2024 07:09 AM)
No he wasn't. That's
bullshit
and exactly what Stalin would have said about the show trials of
his
enemies.
MAGA! FAFO!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. 
-
Uncreative — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 05:25 PM)
You're missing half the story here.
Fatass said he was going to prosecute everyone who investigated him. Investigating current and former presidents is perfectly legal. Play stupid games. Win stupid prizes. -
Lilith — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 06:42 PM)
Then you're being intentionally obtuse.
"He"
isn't investigating anyone. The swamp is going to be drained and career politicians who sit on their ass patting each other on the back while doing nothing for We the People are in for a rude awakening if We the Voters get what we voted for.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
-
Uncreative — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 06:54 PM)
What aren't you getting? He said he wants to put people like Cheney and Schiff in jail for doing a basic part of their jobs legally.
In a normal world a pre-emptive pardon wouldn't be under consideration because a normal president wouldn't be threatening Congress with jail time for doing investigations that they have the legal authority to do. But in a normal world idiots wouldn't be breaking into the Capitol after losing an election either -
Yermom_Is_God — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 07:02 PM)
I like how angry you're getting at the idea that Trump MIGHT do to Democrats exactly what they did to him and many who associated with him. Your concerns are fake, this is partisan hackery, nothing more. You're fine with this type of tyranny and fascism so long as it's your side doing it.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Lilith — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 07:05 PM)
He's stating that they're war hawks and he's stating his opinion on their lack of duty. He, himself, is not doing any investigation. That is up to the judicial system. He said as much when asked directly. He purposely said as much.
Even when it came to Hilary Clinton, he never followed through.
Even when it came to pardoning himself, he declined to do so as that would look as if he were guilty of doing something he weren't guilty of.
He's allowing the legal system to take care of things.
I'm curious, do you think the people in 2020 were doing "mostly peaceful protests" or do you consider what happened across our country as "riots"?
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
Uncreative — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 07:28 PM)
First of all, no, he's not talking about their positions on foreign policy. He's talking about their work on the committee that did an investigation he was a part of. Being a hawk may not be a great position but it's not illegal. They're not the ones who were inventing evidence to invade Iraq, which would be illegal. Cheney's dad might fit into that category, she doesn't. Then she lost her election fair and square and like a regular person does, she accepted it and left office without a fight.
As far as 2020, the ones throwing bricks and starting fires were rioting. The ones who were just in the streets weren't. What the ratio of brick throwers to bystanders was I have no idea.
Meanwhile 100% of the people who entered the building on January 6th were breaking the law. Anyone who stayed outside the grounds might have been either angry, stupid, or both but the people who didn't break in aren't the ones going to jail. -
Yermom_Is_God — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 06:56 PM)
That's not the same thing as the claim you made.
He said Hillary should be in jail tons of times and didn't do one single thing while in office to investigate her or prosecute her.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot