Suck on that MAGA!
-
Hepocles — 2 years ago(April 24, 2023 04:57 PM)
No, Keanu Reeves never pointed a real ****ing gun at anyone in either the Matrix or John Wick movies.
The burden of proof is on you. This is your claim. Were you on the set at the time? I just made the assertion that because it can happen, the armourer's job is to make sure LIVE bullets do not cause a tragedy, if it does happen.
You missed the point dumbass, EVERY firearm is “expected to be loaded” that’s why they’re called FIREARMS.
Not on a film set. They are expected to be loaded at a gun range because the expectation is to be shooting at a target. What is the expectation on a film set? This is really a very simple point that you can't address, because addressing it means that you admit the fault lies with the armourer who allowed live ammunition on set.
Alba gu bràth -
BlablaBlackSheep — 2 years ago(April 24, 2023 05:09 PM)
You’re a dumb retarded wigger, you made the claim asswipe, the burden of proof is on you
You’re ****ing dumb and have no knowledge of gun safety like that ****tard Baldwin. EVERY gun is expected to be loaded, and you NEVER point it at anything you’re not willing to destroy. This is basic firearm safety 101, it does
not ****ing matter if it’s on a film set, backyard, gun range, or in the ****ing Arctic, EVERY GUN IS EXPECTED TO BE LOADED YOU DUMBASS. Just because the armourer lies to you does not give you immunity from shooting and killing someone dumbass 
-
MovieManCin2 — 2 years ago(April 23, 2023 11:57 PM)
A rich Hollyweird Leftist gets away with murder. Why does that NOT surprise me? Don't ban guns, ban Alec Baldwin, you smug Leftard.
MAGA! FAFO!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. 
-
bigbadwolf666 — 2 years ago(April 24, 2023 03:02 AM)
Yea,
I think it’s bullshit.
Im not a fan, even less now, and think he should’ve been charged.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation. -