Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. He was the King Midas of Hollywood

He was the King Midas of Hollywood

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
4 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — James Garner


    Minerva_Meybridge — 11 years ago(July 21, 2014 11:44 PM)

    Everything he acted in turned to gold. I've seen him in Maverick and Rockford Files. Maverick was filmed over half a century ago, and it could stand up today against the best of anything shot today. But he wasn't an actor. He was just himself reading lines. Brett Maverick and Jim Rockford were James Garner in other lives. It is such a shame that such great people have to grow old an die. Whoever made that rule was either cruel or insane.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      denise1234 — 11 years ago(July 25, 2014 12:01 PM)

      Minerva_Meybridge^
      "It is such a shame that such great people have to grow old an die. Whoever made that rule was either cruel or insane."
      I totally agree ~
      ~~ The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what fiction means ~ ~ Oscar Wilde

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Krystyane — 11 years ago(October 11, 2014 04:55 PM)

        Love your thread title!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          anthny_platt — 9 years ago(April 25, 2016 08:10 AM)

          He was an actor. He didn't have range. He couldn't play outside of himself well. But he didn't just stand there and deliver lines.
          He'd probably call himself a 'reactor', because he worked very hard at believable reactions to the events of the story. And it shows.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups