Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Read this story:

Read this story:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
29 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    Chicken_Pirate — 19 years ago(August 07, 2006 08:26 PM)

    And unless you were there yourself, you need to further support your reasoning on why you think Sirhan Sirhan did it. Both of you need to better explain your reasoning.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      fivefids — 19 years ago(November 18, 2006 03:00 PM)

      How about the episode of Inside Edition I have on tape? I taped it in April 1989 and they interviewed Sirhan. In the interview he fully admits that he did it (he has never denied it) and states that he "would give my own life if I could resurect Bobby Kennedy." The more time that passes, the more theories people come up with. Sirhan did it and has never denied it - in fact, not long after he did it, he demanded that he be put to death for it but Ted Kennedy himself intervened and asked that his life be spared.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        teevee — 19 years ago(November 20, 2006 08:28 AM)

        Sirhan with the help of someone else in that large crowd in the kitchen did it.
        That's the only thing that makes sense and what the evidence shows, regardless of what Sirhan has been told to say.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          fivefids — 19 years ago(November 20, 2006 11:00 AM)

          If that's true, why would Sirhan sit in jail for thirty eight years and not reveal who his accomplice was? What does he have to gain by keeping silent?
          I was alive when Kennedy was shot and remember it well. Sirhan was caught right there on the scene with the gun in his hand. If there was an accomplice, how could all of those people have missed him?
          I doubt anyone could keep silent or hidden for the better part of 40 years now. I too am familiar with the "other" evidence but the fact that some truth could stay hidden for almost 40 years seems very unlikely.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            teevee — 19 years ago(November 21, 2006 12:42 PM)

            Sirhan is in jail because he did shoot people.
            However, the evidence and logic seems to suggest there was 1 more person because -how could Sirhan shoot Bobby like 4 times (from those angles), injure a few other people, and still have enough bullets left that got stuck in the ceiling, walls and all over the place?
            And especially like you said, Sirhan was immediately grabbed and put on a table so he would stop.
            It just doesn't make alot of sense to much of the public.
            With all of those people in that small narrow kitchen, and the sudden commotion, it could've been very difficult to know who else was shooting.
            According to evidence throughout the years, people think it could have been one of the bodyguards that was closest to Kennedy.
            His location in relation to Kennedy matched more with Kennedy's wounds than where Sirhan was located.
            The truth is sometimes there but people just don't want to see it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              Buckid — 19 years ago(November 23, 2006 05:31 PM)

              http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/6169006.stm

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  fivefids — 19 years ago(November 30, 2006 06:29 AM)

                  Very well put. If you ask the generation X crowd, they'll find a conspiracy theory for anything. I'm sure there are some that would tell you there was a conspiracy involved in Princess Diana's crash and one involved in Elvis' death and so on.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    teevee — 19 years ago(November 30, 2006 08:22 AM)

                    You'r right a conspiracy is not applicable in every case, but in the case of the kennedys it was possible.
                    Elvis and Diana did NOT have the cia, mob, government people, hoffa or whoever else annoyed with them.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      fivefids — 19 years ago(November 30, 2006 11:51 AM)

                      J Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI, was watching Elvis like a hawk.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        teevee — 19 years ago(November 30, 2006 12:11 PM)

                        You might have misread my post, Elvis did NOT have ties with such people.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          fivefids — 19 years ago(December 01, 2006 08:33 AM)

                          The source I have is an interview with Ringo Starr on the Beatles Anthology. He claimed Elvis did was trying to undermine the Beatles because Elvis felt they weren't good for the American youth. I don't know what Ringo's sources were but he said he was very dissappointed to learn that.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            IMDb User

                            This message has been deleted.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              IMDb User

                              This message has been deleted.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                Blue Wave — 4 years ago(January 27, 2022 03:20 AM)

                                I admit there are questions. However I wonder how he explains his presence there.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  src2n — 19 years ago(November 26, 2006 07:23 PM)

                                  Sirhan Sirhan had to know there was no possible way that he was going to be paroled. His parole would have to be approved by the governor of California, Arnold Schwazenger(sp?) A2000rnold is married to Maria Shriver, who is Robert Kennedy's neice. There is no way Arnold would free the man who killed his wife's uncle. Could you see how much hell he would catch at home!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    teevee — 19 years ago(November 27, 2006 06:00 AM)

                                    The evidence does not suggest all the bullets that killed "Maria's uncle" came from Sirhan's gun.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21

                                      fivefids — 19 years ago(December 06, 2006 10:30 AM)

                                      Yes, but why then is Sirhan keeping quiet if there was an accomplice or if he was set up? He has nothing to gain from keeping quiet almost 40 years later.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        teevee — 19 years ago(December 06, 2006 01:35 PM)

                                        Sirhan seems to be the perfect fall guy.
                                        He never suspected there would be someone else there with him to do the job, in case he couldn't. and evidently Sirhan couldn't, because there were more bullets found than the ones he had in his gun.
                                        Plus, he wasn't even in the location that matched certain wounds.
                                        Sirhan didn't seem astute enough, and that's why he still thinks he did it all himselfbut the evidence doesn't show that.
                                        By having Sirhan as the lone person, erases the need of checking into other people or looking into the motives as to why Bobby was killed.
                                        It was similar with Oswald.
                                        Oswald couldn't have been in the School Book Depository and at the grassy knoll at the same time. An extra person had to be backup in case he missed.
                                        However, Oswald did seem more astute that Sirhan.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          mrbrude1 — 18 years ago(December 31, 2007 01:11 PM)

                                          whether he was alone or not hes spent almost 40 yrs in jailwhy is it that other people who have killed someone have spent alot less time in jail for murder?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups