This has got to be THE stupidest movie in history.
-
skiop — 15 years ago(October 06, 2010 10:58 AM)
Libertarians don't want to legalize drugs. They want to dismantle the government. Republicans always talk about wanting to do that, but still propose these big government solutions to what they consider moral problems (especially with abortion). You really can't have it both ways.
I am a Democrat, by the way, and think the libertarian philosophy of "without an umpire, everyone plays fair" is terribly naive. -
skiop — 15 years ago(October 06, 2010 10:54 AM)
I'm taking it that you don't know what a Marxist is. Plus, using logical fallacies is not the same thing as backing up your lame-brained arguments. Maybe you should turn off FOX News and think for yourself occasionally.
-
skiop — 15 years ago(October 06, 2010 10:51 AM)
There should be an IQ test and a psychological evaluation to be president! The lack of it explains what's in the white house NOW.
What? Obama is the most intelligent and articulate president we've had in a long time. If you want to discuss a president that would fail an IQ test, talk about George W Bush. -
artistathome — 13 years ago(September 01, 2012 06:13 PM)
What was missing from tis movie was a way for the pilots to KNOW that a mistake had occurred. I can assure yu there is a way designed to prevent this situation.
But to show that would ruin the movie i guess. Plus give away secrets.
Additionally those planes should have been shot down if they would not turn. Altho i like the movie, leaving the impression we are that inept is criminal but it served the purpose 50 yrs ago because the writer wanted to scare us.
To anyone who did not live thru the cold war, yu dont have the experience to post!
THis movie is for the 60s generationlater generations dont understand at all.
I REMEMBER eveyyryday yu think today might be the day we get bombed! I am so serious.
no one gets to criticize this movie if you are not at least 60.
Any younger than that and you didnt feel the fear because your parents didnt discuss it in front of the kids. -
artistathome — 13 years ago(September 01, 2012 06:47 PM)
What was missing from tis movie was a way for the pilots to KNOW that a mistake had occurred. I can assure yu there is a way designed to prevent this situation.
But to show that would ruin the movie i guess. Plus give away secrets.
Additionally those planes should have been shot down if they would not turn. Altho i like the movie leaving the impression we are that inept is criminal but it served the purpose 50 yrs ago.
To anyone who did not live thru the cold war, yu dont have the experience to post! This movie is for the 60s generationlater generations dont understand at all. Everyday yu think today might be the day . I am serios so no one gets to critisize this movie if you are not at least 55! -
skiop — 15 years ago(October 06, 2010 10:44 AM)
Stupidest movie in history? I'm taking it you've never seen
Top Secret!
:
http://www.imdb.com/board/10088286/
Ah, hyperbole, you say.
Thank GOD for NOVEMBER.
A misnomer. November really isn't the ninth month, but the eleventh. -
fp_ff_fp — 15 years ago(October 13, 2010 08:18 AM)
simplemines - why're you pushing a failed conservative repuglican agenda ? This was just a movie and a very good one at that.
We have the best person in the White house today but unfortunately idiots in the Congress ( more on the GOP side than the Dem side but both are bad ).
Too bad because Obama has done a lot already and he can do even more if only those idiots in Congress will have the balls to do the right things.
And in November, I hope the people will throw away the useless O'Donnells, Whitmans, Paladino's forever. There really should be an IQ test to be in the govt. Can't believe the GOP has these people as candidates. shudder -
rockmail — 14 years ago(April 30, 2011 05:58 PM)
You're an idiot. The movie is a conceptual thought piece to present intellectual puzzles, not present possible future realities.
You're supposed to be shocked and horrified by the concept of sacrificing a city, and then begin the process of reconsidering whether the whole "mutually assured destruction" concept has any merit to begin with, or if there are better versions to be considered.
At no point were you supposed to think: "Gol darn, THAT would NEVER happen in AMUURRRICA! Unless maybe some COMMIE PINKO got in office."
It's an abstract puzzle, doofus.