They could have defeated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and they could have been effective for a while but then wha
-
Hanz-Willhelm — 12 years ago(March 17, 2014 10:09 AM)
I wonder how long the Nimitz would act independently, doing whatever Yelland ordered verses reporting to the U.S. government at that time and then taking directives from President Roosevelt and the current Naval leaders? Would they have stayed hidden, doing what they thought best or would they have sailed to Pearl or the U.S. West Coast and reported their existence?
-
Hanz-Willhelm — 12 years ago(March 17, 2014 01:04 PM)
I would assume that the complete truth would be the best approach. The truth that they existed formerly in 1979-80 and through some unknown phenomenon ended up there. They would have all the physical evidence on hand that the leaders in 1941 couldn't deny. The knowledge they could supply of historical events that were set to transpire for the next 4 years would be invaluable.
-
mhansen-25806 — 9 years ago(May 23, 2016 12:35 PM)
Can you imagine Nimitz being spotted by search planes from Enterprise (CV-6) which was on the area. Let's see Captain Yelland explain his presence to Admiral Halsey who was aboard "Big E."
My original posting of this message was deleted for some reason.
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it." - Yogi Berra -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(May 23, 2016 09:17 PM)
Enterprise was no where near the area that Nimitz was in.
Nimitz was North of the Hawaiian chain, along the approach route of the Japanese fleet.
Enterprise was to the Southwest, returning from Wake.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
mhansen-25806 — 9 years ago(June 26, 2016 07:41 AM)
I thought Nimitz was to the west or southwest of Pearl since Commander Owens told Captain Yelland the Japanese were,
"off the scope but an educated guess would be around about here. They'd have to be here up around the Northwest sector."
See 44:50 into the movie. Captain Yelland then sent the E-2 there to search.
But, maybe not.
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it." - Yogi Berra -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(June 26, 2016 01:12 PM)
Owens position information was where the Japanese were in relation to Nimitz, not Hawaii. The Japanese aporoached Hawaii from the north.
The Japanese being Northwest of Nimitz means that Nimitz is somewhere East and north of Hawaii.
Enterprise was to the Southwest of Hawaii
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 10, 2016 11:06 AM)
Oh you finally agree that an Ionospheric research facility using high frequency radio transmissions into the upper atmosphere has nothing to do with sonar and hurting sea mammals.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 10, 2016 10:00 PM)
You posted your comment on the wrong thread, but I'll assume that was intentional since you're a comedian sailor.
And againI don't agree with your characterization of the technology in question since critics point out that underwater technology was also developed under this program, but obviously we'll never agree on that.
Again accounts of ship location based on reported directs in history is a subject we can agree on. -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 10, 2016 11:37 PM)
And againI don't agree with your characterization of the technology in question since critics point out that underwater technology was also developed under this program, but obviously we'll never agree on that.
Your "Critics" are not professionals in the field. They are armchair commando internet conspiracy nutjobs with zero understanding of wtf they're talking about. Like YOU.
The HAARP site is a landlocked facility in the middle of Alaska. It has no connection to any oceans, nor does any of it's research have anything to do with water. Those are fraking FACTS, you dumbass.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water! -
kurt-2000 — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 03:30 AM)
Your "Critics" are not professionals in the field.
Your assumption and evasiveness tactic.
armchair commando internet conspiracy nutjobs with zero understanding of wtf they're talking about. Like YOU.
http://www.infowars.com/33-conspiracy-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-true-what-every-person-should-know/ -
CGSailor — 9 years ago(July 11, 2016 04:49 AM)
None not one of the claims you make are a part of those "conspiracies proved true".
And because some conspiracies are proved true does not mean all conspiracies are and will be proved in time.
Additionally every one of those "proved true conspiracies" fall into one of several categories.- normal criminal conspiracies. Not nutcase pseudo-science "grand conspiracies". The one about the Mafia for example
- Not conspiracies at all. just programs that were classified at the time and later declassified after the need for secrecy was over. Manhattan Project and Operation Paperclip for example.
- Still not proven and still bullsh!t. Its the same BS arguments made to "prove" their crap theories as have always been claimed by conspiracy sites. Infowars is a conspiracy site.
I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!