Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
justanicknamed — 9 years ago(August 24, 2016 05:21 AM)
Dam. I didn't know meth was a problem in 1989.
IMDb User
This message has been deleted.
TheArtOfBeingRandom34523 — 9 years ago(August 21, 2016 01:42 PM)
In fact, I agree with you. The whole Nolan trilogy can suck balls AND dick to the Joker at the museum scene
stranglewood — 9 years ago(November 22, 2016 09:57 PM)
It certainly is. It starts off okay, but once jack becomes the joker it goes all the way downhill.
BigDDD — 9 years ago(December 07, 2016 08:01 AM)
It's my favourite batman film
Gobiastia — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 04:03 PM)
It is bad. It has some nice imagery, and a very good soundtrack, but the story and characters are all poorly done.
manchof1 — 9 years ago(February 04, 2017 08:57 PM)
The story is a simple and classic good against evil tale and the characters act like real people who aren't exposition machines like the ones from the Nolan trilogy.
romperstomperz — 9 years ago(February 04, 2017 09:31 PM)
The story is a simple So are the people who defend it.
romperstomperz — 9 years ago(February 04, 2017 01:23 PM)
Like, it's really bad. Sure is. A heap of crap.
Los-Pollos-Hermanos — 9 years ago(February 04, 2017 09:01 PM)
I agree it's bad, not as bad as Batman Returns but still quite bad. About 2/10 score.