Would you do it?
-
TheCommenteer — 16 years ago(September 10, 2009 07:16 PM)
"Are you saying you'd like or love to live next to the prostitutes and drug dealers? Besides, it probably deceases the worth of a property next to these areas. (What kind of family would want to buy a house there? Of course, worrying about a property's worth means one would have to be thinking about buying and putting down roots, instead of just renting.) "
might as well get rid of any lower class suburbs and housing trust areas then, cos nobody wants to live near them. and porn stores. oh and airports. and who would feel safe living next to a crackhouse, mental asylum or soup kitchen, or even ANY factory for that matteri suppose anything that doesnt increase the value of land is therefore bad and should be removed. upper middle class suburbs everywhere, yeah, its my dream too tear
"Actually, I went to a church where there is this woman's shelter two lots away where the women try to better themselves, and they aren't allowed to prostitute within that house, but nothing stops them from going a few blocks down. Between the shelter and the church, there is a park meant for children with slides. The pastor finds condoms on the doorstep of the church. (Great huh?) "
yes, this is a good argument for legalisation of prostitution. then not only would there be higher standards but itd be in a facility rather than in public. obviously there would be some exceptions. but this simply shows its gonna happen anyway, and at least by having the proper facilities it can be controlled, regulated and much cleaner
"You don't have to necessary condemn it, but by labelling it a "victimless crime", what stops you (or anyone else) from encouraging it? "
i do encourage it. i see no difference between this and porn. oh except i think there needs to be higher regulation of that industry too.
"So why not have it seen as trivial as people spitting their gum and that it sticks to your shoe?"
uhbecause in that instance there IS a victimclearly.
"As for you won't be buying from a hooker, well I'm sure you have no worries about getting caught with a prostitute, either, right?"
difference being? not entirely sure whats implied here.
"Not worried she has STDs?"
if it were legal, the risk of STD's would be dramatically reduced.
"STDs don't only come from people in the sex trade, but if a female is trading fluids with 25 different guys (or even women) over 30 days, instead of just 1 guy (or girlfriend?) over 30 days (it doesn't matter the number of times), then she or the other person could be spreading the STD."
as opposed to your average slut (which are greater in number, and far more likely to be infected and not know it) who does roughly the same thing
"Even the men in Hollywood, USA don't get to be totally under the radar if they are photographed or "caught" with a prostitute."
ok?
again youre yet to point to a victim of prostitution. and no, decreased land value isnt gonna cut it. -
nogoodalias — 15 years ago(September 07, 2010 01:25 PM)
Don't prostitution and sex share many of the same risks? Maybe we should make sex a crime, since STD's can be transmitted and some people are under 21, they have it in neighborhoods with children, sometimes even the same house.
Do you want me to unfairly control your life in other ways, because I will.
The 80's wanted so badly to be the future. 2010 is the future. -
securelink070263 — 18 years ago(February 16, 2008 09:14 PM)
Actually, the definition of prostitution is two-fold. It is the act of OFFERING to have sex for money, or it is the act of corrupting something. Ignoring the first definition, which really depends on who initiates, I would have to say that having sex to save a child is not corrupting and thus not prostitution while sex for money is corrupting and thus prostitution.
And to reply to an earlier thread, a single act of sex for money does not make one a whore. The definition of a whore is 'one who engages in sexual acts for money' thus a person is not a whore for having sex for money once, but for continuously engaging in having sex for money. A whore can undo the title by forgoing sex for money.
Source: Webster's Dictionary
(And no, I would not have my wife have sex with another man for money. It does not matter how much.) -
sudan_maninder — 17 years ago(April 07, 2008 04:18 AM)
No Beautiful Noise i m not agree with u & one in world should a honoured person will let his Child die rather to send her wife for such a beep job it doesn't make sense & no problem in this world have this solution.. totaly Distractingggggggggggggg.