Would you do it?
-
securelink070263 — 18 years ago(February 16, 2008 09:14 PM)
Actually, the definition of prostitution is two-fold. It is the act of OFFERING to have sex for money, or it is the act of corrupting something. Ignoring the first definition, which really depends on who initiates, I would have to say that having sex to save a child is not corrupting and thus not prostitution while sex for money is corrupting and thus prostitution.
And to reply to an earlier thread, a single act of sex for money does not make one a whore. The definition of a whore is 'one who engages in sexual acts for money' thus a person is not a whore for having sex for money once, but for continuously engaging in having sex for money. A whore can undo the title by forgoing sex for money.
Source: Webster's Dictionary
(And no, I would not have my wife have sex with another man for money. It does not matter how much.) -
sudan_maninder — 17 years ago(April 07, 2008 04:18 AM)
No Beautiful Noise i m not agree with u & one in world should a honoured person will let his Child die rather to send her wife for such a beep job it doesn't make sense & no problem in this world have this solution.. totaly Distractingggggggggggggg.
-
red_rackham_77 — 18 years ago(March 29, 2008 01:20 PM)
Hey, I am not married and I never wanna but last time I checked; it said 'For richer or for poor' right so that means stick together if they are rich or poor right? Well Hell no I wouldn't gamble like that with my marriage like that (if I was married), No I would tell the millionair to take his money and shove it. I don't care if my man and I live on the streets or in a car; we started with love, we live on love and we may as well die with love.
Obviously David was the only wise character in the story because John still thinks he can buy people even love, Diana should have told John to stay the Hell away from her.