4.7! surely some mistake
-
harlemworldeva — 18 years ago(December 16, 2007 07:00 AM)
Of course this ovie isn't some cinematic masterpiece it's a tremendous guilty pleasure! Just plain fun.
I love this movie with all its goofs and stupidity. Judge Reinhold rocks and so does Eddie Murphy. -
lepunkdigitale — 17 years ago(August 23, 2008 09:23 PM)
I personally don't think anybody should be as snobby as to correct someone's grammar when they're simply discussing their reasons for liking a movie. Fair enough defend your side of the picture(with the acceptance that people are different and the common sense to realise that movie watching is a fairly relative affair of course) , but some people are dyslexic and may not be very good at spelling. We'd all do so much better in this world were it not for up turned noses getting in our way all the time.
-
lakrfan2834 — 19 years ago(February 18, 2007 06:19 PM)
I recently viewed this movie, and although I did not find it to be an unbelievable movie, it was definitely wildly entertaining. Murphy revived his role as Axel Foley quiete brilliantly, and the story had some pizazz to it. Its not a flippin award winning film, but it was enjoyable. ur overreacting bro.
-
cny_cd — 19 years ago(February 26, 2007 12:03 PM)
It's just not that good of a movie, especially when you compare it to the first two. If it was a standalone movie, I could see your point a little bit more, but this movie definately suffers by comparison. I rated it a 5 and I think that's about right. It's watchable, just not memorable.
-
truaxjohn — 19 years ago(February 28, 2007 04:38 PM)
Did a little kid start this topic and tell us that this movie was entertaining? I cannot believe this didn't go straight to video. This is what people talk about when they say a big name gets a movie into 2,000 theatres although the movie is complete junk. This is a paycheck movie and these studios should should carry some accountability for shoveling this junk.
-
masschaos — 18 years ago(October 15, 2007 08:22 PM)
This movie i felt was on par with BHC1, and it kicked 2's ass
BHC1: The movie that started the trilogy, and probably the most sarcastic and honestly funny.
BHC2: Darker sequel, I thought it was good, but nothing more than a lackluster sequel.
BHC3: Whimsical, more flashy and farfetched than the first 2, but had the intelligence and wit that made the first so enjoyable, definitely not an 8, but easily a 6less than 5 is an insult!
I'm no scientist, but those mice were a different color - Lieutinant Colonel Shepard -
-
heelmaster2000 — 17 years ago(June 16, 2008 11:38 AM)
I thought it was alright. Not great by a long shot, not terrible, but I saw it once and will only see it once! I agree that this was a paycheck movie and nothing more to be perfectly honest. In truth I gave it a 6, but that was mainly out of pity.
"Because he's John Doe by choice!" Se7en -
beverhillscopcomingtoame — 17 years ago(June 23, 2008 04:50 PM)
I think that 4.9(the last time i saw the rating) is a mistake, i think that its at least a 6 rating. I would give it a 8-10, I actually liked itbut thats just me a fan of Eddie Murphy as well as the beverly hills cop movies.
-
BHt88 — 13 years ago(July 07, 2012 01:26 PM)
I enjoyed it 8 for me
part 1 is the best then 3 then 2
BHT RISES myspace.com/blackheart60