4.7! surely some mistake
-
truaxjohn — 19 years ago(February 28, 2007 04:38 PM)
Did a little kid start this topic and tell us that this movie was entertaining? I cannot believe this didn't go straight to video. This is what people talk about when they say a big name gets a movie into 2,000 theatres although the movie is complete junk. This is a paycheck movie and these studios should should carry some accountability for shoveling this junk.
-
masschaos — 18 years ago(October 15, 2007 08:22 PM)
This movie i felt was on par with BHC1, and it kicked 2's ass
BHC1: The movie that started the trilogy, and probably the most sarcastic and honestly funny.
BHC2: Darker sequel, I thought it was good, but nothing more than a lackluster sequel.
BHC3: Whimsical, more flashy and farfetched than the first 2, but had the intelligence and wit that made the first so enjoyable, definitely not an 8, but easily a 6less than 5 is an insult!
I'm no scientist, but those mice were a different color - Lieutinant Colonel Shepard -
-
heelmaster2000 — 17 years ago(June 16, 2008 11:38 AM)
I thought it was alright. Not great by a long shot, not terrible, but I saw it once and will only see it once! I agree that this was a paycheck movie and nothing more to be perfectly honest. In truth I gave it a 6, but that was mainly out of pity.
"Because he's John Doe by choice!" Se7en -
beverhillscopcomingtoame — 17 years ago(June 23, 2008 04:50 PM)
I think that 4.9(the last time i saw the rating) is a mistake, i think that its at least a 6 rating. I would give it a 8-10, I actually liked itbut thats just me a fan of Eddie Murphy as well as the beverly hills cop movies.
-
BHt88 — 13 years ago(July 07, 2012 01:26 PM)
I enjoyed it 8 for me
part 1 is the best then 3 then 2
BHT RISES myspace.com/blackheart60 -
-
dasterly2007 — 12 years ago(May 26, 2013 01:26 PM)
I wouldn't even give it 0.
A truly awful film,and worse then the 2nd,and that was bad enough.
I wish they hadn't have made the 1st one now,then I wouldn't have had to sit through garbage like the 2nd and 3rd. -
jajceboy — 11 years ago(September 13, 2014 04:53 PM)
I thought it was O.K but nothing more. As an action-comedy it was kind off disappointment since it wasn't remotely funny but other than that it was solid entertainment.
But I wouldn't watch it more than once. This is the kind of film you watch late at night when there's nothing else on.