4.7! surely some mistake

[fgadmin]

atari_saturna — 18 years ago(January 03, 2008 06:22 AM)

In my opinion BHC2 and BHC3 were far better movies than the first one!

[fgadmin]

Michael_Essien — 18 years ago(February 18, 2008 02:43 PM)

some of it is really crap but i also loved it, i think the bad guy is good, i like uncle dave (though he never said much) and found this a generally entertaining sequel (better than 2 probably)

[fgadmin]

bigombe — 17 years ago(June 02, 2008 11:04 AM)

I watched BHC and BHC 2 100 times back in the eighties; this is not in the same league.
It didn't even feel like a BHC movie with titty bar Axel Foley rescuing kids on a ferris wheel.

[fgadmin]

heelmaster2000 — 17 years ago(June 16, 2008 11:38 AM)

I thought it was alright. Not great by a long shot, not terrible, but I saw it once and will only see it once! I agree that this was a paycheck movie and nothing more to be perfectly honest. In truth I gave it a 6, but that was mainly out of pity.
"Because he's John Doe by choice!" Se7en

[fgadmin]

beverhillscopcomingtoame — 17 years ago(June 23, 2008 04:50 PM)

I think that 4.9(the last time i saw the rating) is a mistake, i think that its at least a 6 rating. I would give it a 8-10, I actually liked itbut thats just me a fan of Eddie Murphy as well as the beverly hills cop movies.

[fgadmin]

Sawyer1625 — 17 years ago(July 12, 2008 06:50 AM)

I would say a 5 maybe 6 at the very most

[fgadmin]

BHt88 — 13 years ago(July 07, 2012 01:26 PM)

I enjoyed it 8 for me
part 1 is the best then 3 then 2
BHT RISES myspace.com/blackheart60

[fgadmin]

TheRapDude — 12 years ago(May 15, 2013 02:06 PM)

I agree with the poster. This was a very good film, sure, it will never top the first two, but it's not nearly as bad as people are making it out to be.
Fear not the darkness, but welcome its embrace.

[fgadmin]

dasterly2007 — 12 years ago(May 26, 2013 01:26 PM)

I wouldn't even give it 0.
A truly awful film,and worse then the 2nd,and that was bad enough.
I wish they hadn't have made the 1st one now,then I wouldn't have had to sit through garbage like the 2nd and 3rd.

[fgadmin]

jajceboy — 11 years ago(September 13, 2014 04:53 PM)

I thought it was O.K but nothing more. As an action-comedy it was kind off disappointment since it wasn't remotely funny but other than that it was solid entertainment.
But I wouldn't watch it more than once. This is the kind of film you watch late at night when there's nothing else on.

[fgadmin]

protoman25 — 10 years ago(October 16, 2015 10:07 PM)

Up to 5.5 now. You were on to something.

[fgadmin]

nginx — 10 years ago(February 14, 2016 01:24 AM)

This movie sucked. There's is no mistake. This is coming from someone who loved the first two.
He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither ~ B. Franklin