This message has been deleted.
-
e-mail9050 — 14 years ago(September 18, 2011 02:07 PM)
you obviously didnt read my definition of parasitic behavior properly..
And maybe egiptians or some other northern states were more advanced, but egiptians aren't really black.. it's more like the middle east in there
the rest were most likely tribes,
"Pre-colonial Africa possessed perhaps as many as 10,000 different states and polities[32] characterised by many different sorts of political organisation and rule. These included small family groups of hunter-gatherers such as the San people of southern Africa"
bla bla, so tribes,
now we expect them to be civilized and it's just not in their nature. we should just leave them be and watch them in safari trips or something and take pictures of them from the back of the trucks.. -
e-mail9050 — 14 years ago(September 18, 2011 11:35 PM)
I really don't care, do a revolution if you have to.
What I care is that the population level of Europe is decreasing, while everywhere else demographics are increasing, this only means that soon in the future the people of Europe will disappear or be assimilated by other people, and I don't think that's very nice at all.
But I guess it's out fault for being such politically correct wusses and for that, we don't deserve to live. -
e-mail9050 — 14 years ago(September 19, 2011 06:22 AM)
well i dont give a sh_t what makes them have more babies to double the population every 30 years, fact is i don't like it.
lol what ? help them ?
haha, parasititc behaviour much ?
and what will they do with the help ? buy a ticket to europe ?
do you realize there are 1 billion people in africa ? im not even sure if their agriculture can support that.
and by the time you help them, they'll be 2 billion anyway. when exactly do you think good social conditions will make them stop ? -
e-mail9050 — 14 years ago(September 19, 2011 07:14 AM)
understand what ?
i don't really think we have any sort of responsibility towards you.
fixing your economy, educating your people,
you know we also have nukes at our disposal, those would surely get things done very quickly, im not saying we should use them.. -
-
lysozymes — 14 years ago(September 19, 2011 11:28 PM)
Sigh western world will benefit both economically and socially by getting the countries in Africa out of their miserable state.
I don't care if the western world has any moral obligation to Africa, but helping them develop stable societies will prevent their crap spilling over to us (drugs, refugees and corruption).
I'm not talking about donations, as most of their government are more corrupt than a conservative tea party, but by increasing the basic education and women's right. Increased education means that they can do more advanced jobs, which leads to a more technological advanced industry. An increased middle class will consume more international products. Better conditions for women's rights will also mean fewer children, as they don't have to worry about a 20-30% child mortality.
A stable society (no wars) will have a more efficient spending of the countries resources. Otherwise it's just one local warlord after another, sucking the country dry. -
e-mail9050 — 14 years ago(September 20, 2011 01:10 AM)
Isn't it very difficult to remove warlords ?
you would need something like armed intervention for that, and probably a puppet government, not just some education. Because you would need to build up good police forces and security.
(Since they are corrupt, it won't just work with asking them to do it properly)
I dont think you really have any idea about what you're talking about, but i can tell you that this situation can't be fixed with normal policies.
And you want to do good in africa, but of course you don't care about the future of you own continents and your own people.
you think it's all great in here and it will be forever.. -
lysozymes — 14 years ago(September 22, 2011 06:09 PM)
Yes, I agree. It is very difficult to remove a warlord. His henchmen would just take over the role. Look at Somalia!
I didn't say I had the solution, if it was that simple - then Africa wouldn't be in such a bad state.
Who would want to pay for the armed intervention and puppet government? We can see how much Afghanistan and Irak is costing the USA. And that's with the oil reserves as incentive!
It takes slow and gradual changes to those countries, one suggestion is change the idea of "tribal" culture. It would prevent more genocides like the Tutsi vs Hutsi (look Hotel Rwanda). Most of the "soldiers" joining these rebel factions do it out of- Poverty
- Religion
- Getting revenge for previous atrocities.
Get them fast food like KFC and cable TV, and you'll see that in 2 generations, no one will want to stage a revolt
Yes, I'm no expert in International Relations. Only been to Ghana and Ethiopia twice as health care worker (upgrading hospital healthcare) and my views are based on those short trips.
-
Snippet90 — 14 years ago(September 20, 2011 11:55 PM)
For everyone saying that this was a true story; it was BASED on a true story, as it always is.
When they say based on a true story, they can take fragments from the real story and implement them with completely new ideas and plot lines to make a completely different story.
There was a man who got saved and went to africa to help kids. Oh wait, lets give add guns and violence and blood too while we're at it. -
IceboxMovies — 14 years ago(September 21, 2011 03:49 PM)
And the moral of the story? White people are free to kill all the black people they want, from Africa to Georgia (cough Troy Davis cough). Now,
WHO
said Social Darwinism wasn't cool!
"What I don't understand is how we're going to stay alive this winter."