How is it that the so called worlds greatest detective
-
Ramboman24 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 01:34 AM)
Too bad there is literally nothing in the movie that confirms this, huh?
Ah, you mean the uncertainty that apparently disappeared once Batman learned a bit more about his opponent?
Yeah, that's what I loved about it. At the end of the day, Batman's humanity ended up trumping his philosophy. He couldn't do it, because at his core, his inner "good guy" just wouldn't allow for it.
Too bad there is literally nothing in the movie that confirms this, huh?
It's honestly less tiring to speculate than it is to get hung up over nitpicks. That's how I see it anyway.The Detective aspect of Batman is overrated anyways. I don't think there are any Batman stories that make for great mysteries anyways.
His gadgets pretty much auto-sleuth for him lol
He obviously knew enough about Superman to exploit his physical weaknesses which is directly related to his urge to wipe him out.
Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale -
Fluffis — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 01:51 AM)
Yeah, that's what I loved about it.
You love inconsistencies?
You love that just because Batman sees humanity in Superman, he suddenly decides that there is zero risk that Superman will ever do something bad?
It's honestly less tiring to speculate than it is to get hung up over nitpicks.
It's not a nitpick, though. It's about Batman's character.
He obviously knew enough about Superman to exploit his physical weaknesses which is directly related to his urge to wipe him out.
Because the defining characteristic of Batman has always been "I know enough to kill him"?
Quidquid Latinae dictum sit, altum viditur. -
Ramboman24 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 04:32 AM)
You love inconsistencies?
You love that just because Batman sees humanity in Superman, he suddenly decides that there is zero risk that Superman will ever do something bad?
Yes, I like that he can't bring himself to kill superman who is ultimately a good man and a hero. His morality prevents him from being able to kill someone like Superman. He's willing to give him a chance.
He puts his faith in Superman, and it pays off because Superman sacrifices himself to kill Doomsday and protect everyone.
That's not being inconsistent it's called changing your mind and it's something that humans do every day.
It's not a nitpick, though. It's about Batman's character.
Certain elements of characters are always changed from the comics.
Because the defining characteristic of Batman has always been "I know enough to kill him"?
We've never really had a story where Batman decides he wants to set out and kill a God. It was new territory for the character.
Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale -
Fluffis — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 05:27 AM)
He's willing to give him a chance
Except for the fact that the entire conflict was due to the fact that Batman was completely unwilling to do that. Even though it would have taken about a minute to find information about how Superman saved the world.
See, I'm not saying that the idea is bad as such - it's just that the execution is really bad.
You're willing to forgive the bad writing because you like the movie. I'm not going to forgive bad writing in a movie that has so much of it.
Quidquid Latinae dictum sit, altum viditur. -
Ramboman24 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 05:28 AM)
completely unwilling to do that
Obviously he wasn't completely unwilling. That's not bad writing. You've just got it wrong. When put it came to the final moment where Batman had the opportunity to show no mercy he decided to show mercy.
Simple as that. Sometimes it's easier to say you're going to act than to actually carry out the act.
Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale -
Fluffis — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 05:31 AM)
if we believe there's even a one percent chance that he is our enemy we have to take it as an absolute certainty
Yeah he was clearly willing to give Superman a chance
Quidquid Latinae dictum sit, altum viditur. -
-
Fluffis — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 06:15 AM)
"I've been planning, for months, to kill you, on the off-chance that you could possibly do harm sometime way in the future! Say what? You have some humanity in you, illustrated by you having a mother? Then everything is hunky dory!"
Do you seriously not see how badly it was handled?
Quidquid Latinae dictum sit, altum viditur. -
Ramboman24 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 06:40 AM)
Do you seriously not see how badly it was handled?
How is that handled poorly it's called a change of heart. Were only human.
He was standing over him with a spear ready to deliver a death blow and he realized what he was doing was not the right way to handle things. He's being totally evil by not allowing a good man to rescue his mother.
The parallels between that situation and the situation where he was defenseless to save his own mother were what snapped him out of feeling he has to follow through on his philosophy.
A 1% chance that Superman can turn bad doesn't really put Batman in a situation where he's incredibly desperate to see the job through. It's not like Superman is in the midst of turning evil at that exact moment.
As I said, he's a human just like you and I, and he's allowed to change his mind.
Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale -
Fluffis — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 07:07 AM)
How is that handled poorly it's called a change of heart.
It's called a plot convenience.
A 1% chance that Superman can turn bad doesn't really put Batman in a situation where he's incredibly desperate to see the job through.
Didn't you hear? He had to treat it as "an absolute certainty".
Except for if the enemy should happen to have a mother. Then all is well.
Quidquid Latinae dictum sit, altum viditur. -
Ramboman24 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 07:12 AM)
Oh FFS so just because someone says something is an absolute certainty it means they 100% have to follow thorough on it even if they're presented with a scenario parallels the situation that made him become Batman in the first place?
I've said "I have to do X task today because it's very important" multiple times before and then decided last minute not to do it and my reasoning was simply because I didn't feel like it.
Anyways you have your feelings towards Batman motivations and you've backed up why you feel that way, and I have my feelings towards his motivation and I've backed up why I feel that way.
They are our opinions and I figure were just going to go around in circles here.
Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale -
Fluffis — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 07:27 AM)
Oh FFS so just because someone says something is an absolute certainty it means they 100% have to follow thorough on it even if they're presented with a scenario parallels the situation that made him become Batman in the first place?
Oh, I'm sorry; I didn't realize pre-pubescent Bruce Wayne was a superpowered alien with the power to destroy mankind.
Well, in that case it becomes completely logical to drop any thoughts that he might level the world one day.
Your right about one thing, though: time to end the discussion.
Quidquid Latinae dictum sit, altum viditur. -
Ramboman24 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 07:40 AM)
we all made a pact
A bunch of 40 yr old losers making imdb pacts
Just priceless.
Actually it's been f-ckin awesome not having to talk to you, TJ, or Ogump in all honesty. Less retardation to deal with.
Thanks
Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale -
OdumC — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 11:20 AM)
You should try itwe all made a pact to stop replying to this idiot.
It wasn't hard for me, the little twat's been ignored since he had his meltdown being proven wrong about how the Kent's were horrible parents. worst depiction of the kent's on screen ever.Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick -
Phantom_Panther — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 01:39 AM)
Too bad there is literally nothing in the movie that confirms this, huh?
Um, yeah there is. You quoted such proof above.
Ah, you mean the uncertainty that apparently disappeared once Batman learned a bit more about his opponent? -
Phantom_Panther — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 02:03 AM)
We see such proof in the way he approaches the problem stating that if there is even a 1% percent chance of him turning bad it must be treated as an absolute certainty. That is not how you view someone you think is a person and not inhuman monster that needs to be put down.
-
Ramboman24 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 04:34 AM)
So you think that's proof that Batman avoided researching Superman in order to not feel conflicted?
There's no proof of that in the film i'll admit that. But that didn't bother me as I said, I can use my imagination just as easily as I can nitpick things.
To me, it's just common sense given his nature In the film. It seems like he is avoiding looking at Superman as a human altogether and more treating him as some sort of potential threat just based on the sheer amount of power he possesses as one man.
Here's what Batman probably fears could go wrong with Superman given his cynical nature:
Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale