Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Dead Men Tell No Tales Prediction

Dead Men Tell No Tales Prediction

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
46 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    Evangelion217 — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 05:17 AM)

    It might make 900 million dollars worldwide.
    Last Films seen:
    Fantastic Four(2015)- 5/10
    Sully(2016)- 8/10
    Don't Breath(2016)- 9/10

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #32

      allblacks-1 — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 08:43 AM)

      $800 mil. WW seems like a safe bet.
      The problem is that there are (unconfirmed by respected sources) rumors that it went way over budget and might finish costing around the last one, i.e. ~$400 mil.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #33

        TrevorAclea — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 09:52 AM)

        The problem is that there are (unconfirmed by respected sources) rumors that it went way over budget and might finish costing around the last one, i.e. ~$400 mil.
        $800m seems about right, though the budget rumors surprise me. I was under the impression that the reason for the incredibly long post-production period (it shot back in Spring 2015, more than two years before the release date) was to avoid all the massive cost overruns on the last two films when they were rushing to meet the release date and pouring money into the effects to get them ready in time. Even with three weeks of reshoots in Spring, it doesn't seem like there was major surgery, though this has been one of those franchises that has a lot of built-in problems that drive budget overruns - not least filming at sea.
        "Security - release the badgers."

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #34

          allblacks-1 — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 03:52 PM)

          Well, the main source is Daily Mail.
          So it can either be true or Daily Mail.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #35

            cornnetto — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 10:06 AM)

            400 million, that would be 10 million cheaper than the last one, good job.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #36

              allblacks-1 — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 03:59 PM)

              To follow my answer to Trev - and to be Daily Mail-precise - the overrun 'was' $70 mil. over greenlighted budget of $250 mil. and with production far from over.
              Personally I definitely can see this movie costing close to $300 mil. after rebates.
              But to move towards or beyond $400 for the second time in a row - after hiring cheapest and experience-ed directors available (two for the price of half-Rob Marshall I bet and might add) and doing everything,including reserving 2 years for post, in their power to avoid overruns - would truly be something.
              Should that be true - Nic Cage will never see another "National Treasure"-paycheck, that's for sure.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #37

                bruinjoe_II — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 09:10 AM)

                $88 million OW
                $250 million domestic
                $950 million WW
                TEAM CAP

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #38

                  xbs2034 — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 09:29 AM)

                  There have been surprises before, but I don't see how this outgrosses the previous film domestically.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #39

                    HelloMyNameIsMrBurns — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 10:18 AM)

                    $150 domestic, $700 million overseas.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #40

                      DaxTony — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 10:46 AM)

                      OW: $90 million
                      DOM: $220 million
                      INTL: $780 million
                      WW: $1,000 billion

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #41

                        Laur-El — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 02:44 PM)

                        175M Dom
                        680 OS
                        =855M WW

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #42

                          Sloth85 — 9 years ago(October 04, 2016 05:38 AM)

                          Perhaps I'm out of touch given the low predictions bit ill go with:
                          Dom: $206
                          WW: $938
                          A continued drop off domestically although not off a cliff like many feel as I find that this franchise has a following. I think a drop WW is inevitable given Depps falling star but the last one stunk and still made over a billion. I think it's one of those franchises that the oversees crowd just inexplicably loves (see Fast and Furious franchise as well as Tramsformers).

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #43

                            L0GAN5 — 9 years ago(October 04, 2016 05:41 PM)

                            Dom: $206
                            WW: $938
                            It doesn't look that out of touch to be fair. I think Transformers is a good comparison for this series. The last film lost a third of its domestic audience and about 10% of its non-Chinese foreign audience, so a similar scenario here would result in $180 million domestic and $800-900 million worldwide (excluding China).
                            The foreign exchange rate has taken a severe pounding in the last couple of years though, losing at least 20% of its value everywhere except Asia, so let's say there is another 25% drop across the non-Asian foreign markets then that would bring the total down to around $700 million (still excluding China).
                            In the same period the Chinese gross doubled for Transformers, so if that's also the case for POTC, I think $800-900 million is a reasonable projection, once you factor in franchise fatigue, Chinese growth and the exchange rates.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #44

                              dalbrech — 9 years ago(October 04, 2016 10:28 AM)

                              Ouch. If it did break the 300 million barrier, it is going to cut into the profits. Oh,it will make money,but IMHO Disney is playing Russian Reloutte with these constant huge overruns,and someday the gun will go off.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #45

                                xbs2034 — 9 years ago(October 04, 2016 11:58 AM)

                                They already did with the huge overruns on Lone Ranger and John Carter, but Disney has showed they can take flops like those without too much problem. The whole home run or strike out mentality seems risky, but its working, and I bet they would be fine with their other movies even if Pirates 5 is a worst case outcome.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #46

                                  cornnetto — 9 years ago(October 04, 2016 12:32 PM)

                                  Disney has showed they can take flops like those without too much problem
                                  Well ESPN annual revenue (11 billion) alone is the equivalent of 10 Star Wars Force Awaken movie box office revenue.
                                  The whole home run or strike out mentality seems risky, but its working,
                                  It is going extremely well:
                                  Revenues:
                                  Media Networks $ 23,264
                                  Parks and Resorts 16,162
                                  Studio Entertainment 7,366
                                  Consumer Products 4,499
                                  Interactive 1,174
                                  Total:52,465
                                  Segment operating income:
                                  Media Networks $ 7,793
                                  Parks and Resorts 3,031
                                  Studio Entertainment 1,973
                                  Consumer Products 1,752
                                  Interactive 132
                                  Total: 14,681
                                  As you see the complete studio entertainment segment is 14% of Disney revenue and 13.4% of the profit in a very good year for them (26% margin is crazy for studio entertainment).
                                  The only going for big franchise movie or swinging to create new one, create IP to put into the parks and consumer products. They are probably ok and happy as long as some of them become franchise they can put in their park and merchandise (and you cannot have more than X of those I guess, or they cannibalize each other anyway). A successful one for Disney pay much more and for a decade (pumping sequels, park attraction, merchandises, etc) than a major failure cost them (a one time and limited cost).

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups