Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Could Al Turda be a Tara sock?

Could Al Turda be a Tara sock?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
20 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    /.ㅤ — 10 months ago(May 13, 2025 10:35 PM)

    I don't use socks.
    Ahem
    TaraDeS is back, Wu Ming is sleeping.
    Hmm
    My password is password.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 13, 2025 10:38 PM)

      by /.ㅤ May 14, 2025 12:35 AM
      Member since January 25, 2022
      "I don't use socks."
      Ahem
      "TaraDeS is back, Wu Ming is sleeping."
      Hmm
      Mousy 🐭 on the
      shared account
      /.
      pretends to not know what socks are.
      🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 03:09 AM)

        Paranoid much?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 05:40 AM)

          dbentley666 May 14, 2025 05:09 AM
          Member since June 11, 2018
          Paranoid much?
          Regarding the threads on the TWD board it's more poor Bentley with a mental defect. 🤪

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:00 PM)

            That makes no sense. But then you rarely do.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:26 PM)

              dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:00 PM
              Member since June 11, 2018
              That makes no sense. But then you rarely do.
              The
              wannabe 666
              👿​ always stops understanding English when it's inconvenient for him. ☺
              Btw. good trick that I like to use too.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:27 PM)

                That should be "convenient." Try translating it back into German, and then you might figure it out. Also, it's not a "good trick" for you. Your not understanding English is a way of life, a telos.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:29 PM)

                  dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:27 PM
                  Member since June 11, 2018
                  That should be "convenient." Try translating it back into German, and then you might figure it out.
                  Isn't it
                  "conveniently"
                  in this context?
                  lylylylylylylyly. 🤣

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:31 PM)

                    dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:30 PM
                    Member since June 11, 2018
                    No.
                    Adverb –> lylylylyly
                    No? ☺

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:32 PM)

                      No. Not in that sentence.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:34 PM)

                        dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:32 PM
                        Member since June 11, 2018
                        No. Not in that sentence.
                        However, with or without lylylylyly it's understandable. 😜​

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:36 PM)

                          What is?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:40 PM)

                            dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:36 PM
                            Member since June 11, 2018
                            What is?
                            Read again, it's your stupid and wrong call-out thread, little
                            666
                            . 👿​
                            Check your base…lylylylylylylyly. ☺

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:57 PM)

                              TaraDeS said...
                              dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:36 PM
                              Member since June 11, 2018
                              What is?
                              Read again, it's your stupid and wrong call-out thread, little
                              666
                              . 👿​
                              Check your base…lylylylylylylyly. ☺
                              expand
                              So you don't want to reprint your error-ridden sentence? Makes sense.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups